2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency response function shape-based methods for structural damage localisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the IFS index at each natural frequency is closely related to its modal flexibility form. Therefore the damage location can be described by IFS index, which in turn supports the validity of the method in [6]. Inspired by ULS and IFS index, here a novel index is proposed as { } (10) in which ωq and ωs limited the frequency range, consisting of m natural frequencies.…”
Section: Construction Of Damage Localization Indexmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means that the IFS index at each natural frequency is closely related to its modal flexibility form. Therefore the damage location can be described by IFS index, which in turn supports the validity of the method in [6]. Inspired by ULS and IFS index, here a novel index is proposed as { } (10) in which ωq and ωs limited the frequency range, consisting of m natural frequencies.…”
Section: Construction Of Damage Localization Indexmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Some researchers extended mode shape-based index to broadband frequency ranges using FRF shape information. Liu et al [6] …”
Section: Construction Of Damage Localization Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the direct use of FRF shapes has been studied by many researchers. For example, Liu et al [65] made use of the residual imaginary parts of FRF shapes to locate the structural damage and the abnormality caused by damage in a cantilever beam. Salehi et al [66] presented a damage detection technique based on both the real and imaginary parts of measured FRF shape.…”
Section: Frequency Domain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not considering just the FRFs in the low-frequency range, Friswell [10] gives an overview of the usage of inverse methods in damage detection and location, by measured vibration data. Liu et al [11] used the imaginary part of FRF shapes and normalized FRF shapes for damage localization. Their method was illustrated by a numerical example of a cantilever beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%