2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.71.011401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-resolved optical gating for complete reconstruction of attosecond bursts

Abstract: We describe a method for the complete temporal characterization of attosecond extreme ultraviolet ͑xuv͒ fields. An electron wave packet is generated in the continuum by photoionizing atoms with the attosecond field, and a low-frequency dressing laser pulse is used as a phase gate for frequency-resolved-optical-gating-like measurements on this wave packet. This method is valid for xuv fields of an arbitrary temporal structure, e.g., trains of nonidentical attosecond pulses. It establishes a direct connection be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
440
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
440
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the FROG-CRAB, VTGPA and PROBP methods assume that the measured photoelectron spectrogram can be modeled by SFA [19,20]:…”
Section: A Strong Field Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the FROG-CRAB, VTGPA and PROBP methods assume that the measured photoelectron spectrogram can be modeled by SFA [19,20]:…”
Section: A Strong Field Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus time information of the attosecond pulse is encoded in the amount of momentum shift in the streaked spectrogram. A standard technique known as FROG-CRAB (Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating for Complete Reconstruction of Attosecond Bursts) [19][20][21] has been used to retrieve the attosecond pulse, which stems from the FROG (Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating) method for the characterization of femtosecond infrared laser pulses. The retrieval is based on an iterative process by matching the measured photoelectron spectrogram to a FROG-CRAB trace from an unknown XUV pulse and an unknown IR field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve attosecond time resolution at lower energy scales, a variety of methods are employed. Autocorrelation schemes use the test pulse and its time-shifted replica (Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating (FROG) [20,21]) or the time-and frequency-shifted replica (Spectral Phase Interferometry for Direct Electric field Reconstruction (SPIDER) [22,23]), while cross-correlation schemes are based on the correlation between the test XUV pulse and a femtosecond infrared laser pulse. The latter can be weak, inducing few photon effects (Reconstruction of Attosecond Beating By Interference of Two-photon Transitions (RABBITT) [2]) or strong, yielding attosecond streak imaging [24,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the temporal characteristics of a train of attosecond pulses were directly determined by measuring second-order autocorrelation traces [14]. Similar methods have been used for attosecond spectral phase interferometry for direct electric field reconstruction (SPIDER) and attosecond frequencyresolved optical gating (FROG) techniques [15][16][17][18][19], and for their extensions [20][21][22]. The cross-correlation technique has been widely used in characterizing pulse durations [1][2][3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical errors of the pulse reconstruction are quantitatively analyzed therein. The major difference between the proposed method and the FROG CRAB [20] is that we reconstruct an attosecond XUV pulse from only one measured PES, rather than from a large set of time-resolved PESs, as used in FROG for selfconsistency in the data. Thus, the efficiency and speed of PES measurement and pulse reconstruction can be greatly improved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%