2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16050649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Optimization for Enhancement of Surface Defect Classification Using the Eddy Current Technique

Abstract: Eddy current testing is quite a popular non-contact and cost-effective method for nondestructive evaluation of product quality and structural integrity. Excitation frequency is one of the key performance factors for defect characterization. In the literature, there are many interesting papers dealing with wide spectral content and optimal frequency in terms of detection sensitivity. However, research activity on frequency optimization with respect to characterization performances is lacking. In this paper, an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given conductive material, the frequency is not only concerned with the skin depth but also with the probe signal magnitude. An optimal frequency exists at which the maximum signal is retrieved for a fixed-size defect [27]. Figure 6 gives the simulated results by using the rotating probe excited by harmonic currents with the same density of 1.67 × 10 6 A/m 2 but different frequencies.…”
Section: Detection Of Arbitrary Orientation Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given conductive material, the frequency is not only concerned with the skin depth but also with the probe signal magnitude. An optimal frequency exists at which the maximum signal is retrieved for a fixed-size defect [27]. Figure 6 gives the simulated results by using the rotating probe excited by harmonic currents with the same density of 1.67 × 10 6 A/m 2 but different frequencies.…”
Section: Detection Of Arbitrary Orientation Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this paper and the follow-up research, defect resistance signals will be used to automatically identify and classify defects. In addition, thanks to the single-hidden layer feedforward neural networks of ELM, it is superior to SVM in classification accuracy and generalization [30], and its training time is much lower than that of ANN [19,20]. In this paper, the length and depth of defects are fitted by the peak values of the resistance, reactance, and impedance of eddy current signals.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of tube defect parameters performed with a high accuracy Fan et al 151 Both kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) and a support vector machine (SVM)…”
Section: Estimation and Classification The Geometrical Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%