1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90233-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is within the range (70-80%) suggested by Ketley and Woods10 11 as the likely optimum rate of eligibility for thrombolytic therapy and less than the National Health Service recommended rate (90%) 12. By contrast, some studies reporting low rates of thrombolytic use may have excluded potentially eligible patients—for example, elderly patients, diabetic patients, or patients treated by primary angioplasty 7 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is within the range (70-80%) suggested by Ketley and Woods10 11 as the likely optimum rate of eligibility for thrombolytic therapy and less than the National Health Service recommended rate (90%) 12. By contrast, some studies reporting low rates of thrombolytic use may have excluded potentially eligible patients—for example, elderly patients, diabetic patients, or patients treated by primary angioplasty 7 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The proportion of patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy reportedly varies from 15-16%7 8 to 79% 9. These figures are affected by whether eligibility is based on admission electrocardiographic and time window criteria or a discharge diagnosis of myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been significantly improved during the last decade [6,19], mainly due to the extensive spread of aspirin ®, [3-blockers, and reperfusion therapy by pharmacological agents (that is thrombolytic therapy) and interventional catheterization methods [17]. However, 2 thirds of AMI-patients still do not receive lytic therapy [1,21] for a variety of reasons, and their mortality rate, especially in the elderly (> 70 years) is high, in the range of 12 to 25% [5,20,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is estimated that two thirds of AMI patients do not receive reperfusion therapy [2](i.e. thrombolytic agents or coronary angioplasty) and their in-hospital mortality rate, particularly in the elderly, is in the high range of 14–20% [3, 4, 5]. During the last decade, efforts have been made to find additional adjunctive pharmacologic treatments with the use of agents such as nitrates and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%