1980
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320070316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of the branchio‐oto‐renal (BOR) syndrome in children with profound hearing loss

Abstract: Nineteen of 421 white children in Montreal schools for the deaf had preauricular pits. The branchio-oto-renal (BOR syndrome was identified in four of the nine families who agreed to family investigation, including audiograms and intravenous pyelograms (IVPs) and may have been present in several others. The penetrance of this autosomal dominant syndrome appears to be high. It is estimated that severe renal dysplasia occurs in about 6% of heterozygotes. The presence of a preauricular pit at birth suggests that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
137
1
9

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
137
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Although patients without renal abnormalities were sometimes considered to have BO syndrome, recent reports have categorized them as part of a single BOR condition (Allanson 1995). In BOR syndrome, hearing loss is the most prevalent symptom (89%), followed by preauricular pits (77%), branchial cleft fistulas (63%), and renal anomalies (13%) (Fraser et al 1980). However, previous reports regarding renal anomalies have probably underestimated them because they were usually minor and asymptomatic (see Allanson 1995 for review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although patients without renal abnormalities were sometimes considered to have BO syndrome, recent reports have categorized them as part of a single BOR condition (Allanson 1995). In BOR syndrome, hearing loss is the most prevalent symptom (89%), followed by preauricular pits (77%), branchial cleft fistulas (63%), and renal anomalies (13%) (Fraser et al 1980). However, previous reports regarding renal anomalies have probably underestimated them because they were usually minor and asymptomatic (see Allanson 1995 for review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of the BOR syndrome has been estimated as 1 : 40,000, and therefore may account for as much as 2%-3% of profound hearing loss in children (Fraser et al 1980). Recent advances in molecular genetics have revealed that the gene responsible for BOR syndrome is localized in 8q Smith et al 1992), and that there were various mutations in the EYA1 gene, the human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene, in Northern European and other BOR patients (Abdelhak et al 1997a;Abdelhak et al 1997b;Kumar et al 1997/98;Kumar et al 1998a;Kumar et al 1998b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A set of diagnostic criteria was suggested by Chang et al 3 Based on clinical presentation, the prevalence of BOR was estimated to be 1:40 000, and to affect approximately 2% of profoundly deaf children. 4 Hearing loss is a crucial finding, presenting as sensorineural, conductive or mixed type with about equal distribution of the three types of hearing loss. The hearing impairment may be progressive and fluctuating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Clinical expression is highly variable within and among families, but typical manifestations are branchial arch anomalies (preauricular pits, branchial fistulae and pinnae abnormalities), hearing loss (conductive, sensorineural or mixed) and renal hypoplasia. 5,6 BOR syndrome was localised to chromosome 8q13.3 by linkage analysis 7 -14 and deletion mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%