2002
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of the Amsterdam Criteria in a Regional German Cohort of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Estimates of the colon cancer burden associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) vary from less than 1 % to more than 5 %. Amsterdam criteria fulfilled within a kindred (classic Amsterdam and Amsterdam II criteria) are widely used to identify patients prone to HNPCC. The present study was initiated to assess the frequency of the Amsterdam criteria within a regional German cohort of 207 patients with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC). Data on individual and family cancer histories were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The burden of hereditary colorectal cancer corresponds to the wide published spectrum of 1 - 13% but is lower than average estimates 5 - 6% [24]. As expected, it exceeds the described proportion of families corresponding to Amsterdam criteria [25] although similar proportions have also been reported [26]. The burden of hereditary gastric cancer is higher than estimated by Cisco et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The burden of hereditary colorectal cancer corresponds to the wide published spectrum of 1 - 13% but is lower than average estimates 5 - 6% [24]. As expected, it exceeds the described proportion of families corresponding to Amsterdam criteria [25] although similar proportions have also been reported [26]. The burden of hereditary gastric cancer is higher than estimated by Cisco et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Among the eight index patients whose tumors had lost MLH1 expression, two (25%) were found to carry large genomic rearrangements in the MLH1 gene. In view of the late age at diagnosis (z68 years), as well as an inconspicuous family history in four of the MLH1 mutation-negative patients, it is likely that these cancers are actually sporadic in origin, due to hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter rather than due to an inherited germ line mutation (17). With mRNA available for further study, the consequence of the MLH1 deletion encompassing exons 7 to 9 ( family 1806) could be assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr. Andrew N. Freedman (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, Bethesda, MD) conducted a literature search and found 10 population-based colorectal cancer studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42) that examined clinical and family history and prevalence of HNPCC. Despite the fact that these studies were conducted in different populations and with different sample sizes, age structures, and ascertainment methods, similar prevalence estimates were found for HNPCC across all studies.…”
Section: Best Strategies For Identifying Individuals With Mlh1 or Msh2 Gene Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%