2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of postmortem ethanol formation in blood, urine and vitreous humor – Improving diagnostic accuracy with the use of ethylsulphate and putrefactive alcohols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another dimension to the discussion about PM alcohol formation was brought by Oshaug et al (2022), however, without focusing on drowning cases. They carried out complementary analyses of the putrefaction alcohols (PA) 1‐propanol and 1‐butanol in blood, as these findings suggest that detected BAC values were partly or fully caused by PM formation.…”
Section: Pm Changes Of Alcohol and Drugs In Submerged Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another dimension to the discussion about PM alcohol formation was brought by Oshaug et al (2022), however, without focusing on drowning cases. They carried out complementary analyses of the putrefaction alcohols (PA) 1‐propanol and 1‐butanol in blood, as these findings suggest that detected BAC values were partly or fully caused by PM formation.…”
Section: Pm Changes Of Alcohol and Drugs In Submerged Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the interpretation of relative results may present limitations and complexities mainly due to the postmortem ethanol neo-formation (which is actually microbial ethanol production) [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] at the interval from death up to the analysis of the sample. To achieve a feasible accuracy in interpreting the postmortem ethanol analysis results and in defining the origin (whether it is a result of antemortem consumption or postmortem microbial production or both) of the measured ethanol, various factors have been evaluated [ 5 , 10 , 11 ], such as the putrefaction state of the cadaver at autopsy, the clinical history of the deceased, the determination of non-oxidative metabolites of ethanol, the identification of microbes in the analyzed sample, and the evaluation of the discrepancies between ethanol concentration from various sampling sites and from different specimens [ 5 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Furthermore, the detection of low-molecular-weight volatiles in postmortem specimens was related to the microbial ethanol neo-formation [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%