18In many organisms, dispersal varies with the local population density. Such patterns of density-19 dependent dispersal (DDD) are expected to shape the dynamics, spatial spread and invasiveness 20 of populations. Despite their ecological importance, empirical evidence for the evolution of DDD 21 patterns remains extremely scarce. This is especially relevant because rapid evolution of 22 dispersal traits has now been empirically confirmed in several taxa. Changes in DDD of 23 dispersing populations could help clarify not only the role of DDD in dispersal evolution, but 24 also the possible pattern of subsequent range expansion. Here, we investigate the relationship 25 between dispersal evolution and DDD using a long-term experimental evolution study on 26 Drosophila melanogaster. We compared the DDD patterns of four dispersal-selected populations 27 and their non-selected controls. The control populations showed negative DDD, which was 28 stronger in females than in males. In contrast, the dispersal-selected populations showed density-29 independent dispersal, where neither males nor females exhibited DDD. Our results are contrary 30 to the expectations from previous studies, which predict that dispersal evolution at range edges 31 leads to stronger negative DDD patterns. We discuss the possible reasons for this divergence 32 from earlier predictions and its implications for spatial ecology and evolution. 33 34 Keywords: density-dependent dispersal, sex-biased dispersal, Drosophila melanogaster, 35 dispersal propensity, temporal dispersal profile, spatial sorting 36 37 Biological dispersal, an integral part of the life history in many taxa (Bonte and Dahirel 2017), is 39 a major determinant of spatial distribution of living organisms. Dispersal patterns influence 40 several ecological phenomena, including biological invasions, range expansions and community 41 assembly (Bowler and Benton 2005; Clobert et al. 2009; Lowe and McPeek 2014). The specifics 42 of a given dispersal event, in turn, are regulated by numerous biotic and abiotic factors (Bowler 43 and Benton 2005; Matthysen 2012). One such factor that can be a prominent cause of variation 44 in the dispersal patterns of many species is the local population density, leading to density-45 dependent dispersal (DDD) (reviewed in Matthysen 2005; Harman et al. 2020).
46Population density can affect the movement of individuals in many ways. For instance, DDD is 47 defined as positive when the per capita dispersal increases with increasing population density, 48 often manifesting as greater proportional movement from dense regions to sparse regions (e.g. 49 Aars and Ims 2000; De Meester and Bonte 2010; Bitume et al. 2013; Lutz et al. 2015). Similarly, 50 negative DDD implies a reduction in per capita movement with increasing population density, 51 resulting in greater aggregation in crowded regions and higher net emigration from sparse 52 regions (e.g. Andreassen and Ims 2001; Baguette et al. 2011; Pennekamp et al. 2014; Mishra et 53 al. 2018b). In addition, r...