1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90017-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of occlusal interferences: A clinical study in teenagers and young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of occlusal interferences in the mouth has been noted to have an incidence of between 75-89% in Agerberg and Sandstrom's study. 5 This study's subject group consisted of teenagers and young adults. Unilateral tooth contacts in retruded position were found in 75% of both subject groups.…”
Section: N B R I E Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of occlusal interferences in the mouth has been noted to have an incidence of between 75-89% in Agerberg and Sandstrom's study. 5 This study's subject group consisted of teenagers and young adults. Unilateral tooth contacts in retruded position were found in 75% of both subject groups.…”
Section: N B R I E Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing this with the whole mouth study of Agerberg and Sandstrom, 5 the incidence in this limited area of study would appear to be high. The high incidence of occlusal interferences involving unopposed teeth is of great clinical significance to the restorative dentist, not only when restoring the unopposed tooth, or replacing the missing opponent.…”
Section: Occlusal Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-patient prevalence study indicates closely 75% of subjects with just one TMD sign, and 33% with at least one symptom 7 . Another estimate related that 50 to 75% of the evaluated general population would have one TMD sign 10 and 20 to 25%, one symptom in any life period 3 . TMD severity studies should provide a health care 4 4 need estimate in the population studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TMD prevalence difference between the genders is yet to be thoroughly understood, some theories have tried to explain why women seem to be more affected than men, as Agerberg and Sandstrom 30 , believe that women are not so skilled to deal with pressure, causing a greater number of functional disorders. Abubaker et al 31 shows that estrogen receptors in women's TMJ are present in greater quantity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%