2015
DOI: 10.17795/bhs-27009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis in Endocervical Samples of Women Referred to a Gynecology Hospital in Qazvin, Iran

Abstract: Background:Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI). Although most genital C. trachomatis infections remain asymptomatic but infection with these bacteria is the leading cause of complications, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), tubal factor infertility and abortion. Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of C. trachomatis infection among symptomatic and asymptomatic women, by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our finding, higher rates of CT infection were reported in women attending gynecology clinics in Mbarara, Uganda (26.5%) [16], Jos, Nigeria (51.6%) [17]and South Eastern Nigeria(40.7%) [18]. However, lower rates of CT was reported in Western Kenya (3%) [19], North Western Nigeria(9.6%) [15]and Iran (8.3%) [20]. These disparities in prevalence rates could be due to a varying distribution of risk factors in different populationand geographical regions as well as different laboratory methods, which may have different sensitivity and specificity [16, 17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our finding, higher rates of CT infection were reported in women attending gynecology clinics in Mbarara, Uganda (26.5%) [16], Jos, Nigeria (51.6%) [17]and South Eastern Nigeria(40.7%) [18]. However, lower rates of CT was reported in Western Kenya (3%) [19], North Western Nigeria(9.6%) [15]and Iran (8.3%) [20]. These disparities in prevalence rates could be due to a varying distribution of risk factors in different populationand geographical regions as well as different laboratory methods, which may have different sensitivity and specificity [16, 17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%