2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03356369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of a mutant allele of cytochrome b conferring resistance to Ool fungicides in the Czech population of Ramularia collo-cygni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutant and wild alleles of cytochrome b in the Czech population of Rcc were detected at an equal rate (Matusinsky et al. ). Based on this finding, it can be assumed that the rate of resistant Rcc populations will increase with the use of strobilurin fungicides, potentially increasing the incidence of the allele to nearly 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mutant and wild alleles of cytochrome b in the Czech population of Rcc were detected at an equal rate (Matusinsky et al. ). Based on this finding, it can be assumed that the rate of resistant Rcc populations will increase with the use of strobilurin fungicides, potentially increasing the incidence of the allele to nearly 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 406‐bp sequence of the Rcc cytochrome b gene was amplified by PCR (Matusinsky et al. ). The reactions were carried out in 20 μl volumes, containing 10 ng of fungal DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first products to be registered were based on prothioconazole (demethylation-inhibitor: DMI) and chlorothalonil (Ctl, multi-site), followed by boscalid Table 2) has given barley growers a significant boost in their options to control pathogens (Russell, 2009) However there are concerns surrounding stewardship of SDHIs and asRcc is capable of relatively rapid resistance build up (Fountaine and Fraaije 2009;Matusinsky et al 2010) guidelines for their use have been produced (FRAC 2014).…”
Section: Page 9 Of 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no significant differences in RLS control between the two application timings, although the splitting and late application increased RLS control marginally compared to an early application. Fungicide applications between GS 37 and GS 55 are considered optimal for disease control (Matusinsky et al 2010). McCabe (2009) also reported GS 49 or later as optimal fungicide timing for ensuring yield, late season fungicide applications are considered the most effective tool to protect leaves and ears from the fungus (Havis et al 2014;Heß et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%