The Wonder of Nanotechnology: Quantum Optoelectronic Devices and Applications
DOI: 10.1117/3.1002245.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Noise and Linewidth of Mid-infrared Continuous- Wave Quantum Cascade Lasers: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QCLs usually exhibit near-zero LBFs, leading to narrow intrinsic linewidth in the range of 0.1-1.0 kHz [21][22][23]. However, the latter flicker noise arising from the current source, the thermal fluctuation, and the internal electrical noise considerably broadens the total spectral linewidth of QCLs to the sub-MHz or MHz range [24][25][26]. In order to narrow the spectral linewidth of QCLs, a large variety of frequency stabilization schemes have been proposed, including electronic feedback to the current source [27], locking to an optical cavity [28], phase locking to a narrow-linewidth laser source [29], as well as the popular optical injection locking to an optical frequency comb [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QCLs usually exhibit near-zero LBFs, leading to narrow intrinsic linewidth in the range of 0.1-1.0 kHz [21][22][23]. However, the latter flicker noise arising from the current source, the thermal fluctuation, and the internal electrical noise considerably broadens the total spectral linewidth of QCLs to the sub-MHz or MHz range [24][25][26]. In order to narrow the spectral linewidth of QCLs, a large variety of frequency stabilization schemes have been proposed, including electronic feedback to the current source [27], locking to an optical cavity [28], phase locking to a narrow-linewidth laser source [29], as well as the popular optical injection locking to an optical frequency comb [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of the technical noise gave us a stability which is comparable to the product of the linewidths of the two DFB QC lasers, reported to be 1 MHz each in the literature. [23] Finally, we remark that if we could integrate on a 1 Hz bandwidth, we can extrapolate a theoretical NEP at 0.7V of ~10 -18 W at 300K.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To this end we have minimized all the external sources of noise that compromise lasers stability: most importantly i) fluctuations of the lasers temperature, ii) the noise from the lasers current generator and iii) the optical feedback. [23] Temperature was controlled by mounting the DFB lasers on Peltier cooler elements stabilized to the mK, while current noise was minimized by using two low noise homemade current drivers (100 pA Hz -1/2 ). [24] Optical feedback was also reduced by employing an Innovation Photonics MIR isolator based on a Faraday rotator principle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this operating condition, the typical FWHM is 0.16 cm -1 with a current pulse duration of 50ns and a repetition rate at 100 kHz. The FWHM is in particular affected by self-heating phenomenon that broadens the linewidth (FWHM of a free running QCL is between 1MHz-10MHz in CW mode with an efficient thermal drain) [23]. Other technical noises of the set-up results also in a spectral broadening, and the self-heating contribution cannot be properly quantified with our current set-up.…”
Section: Electro Optic Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 93%