2014
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2014.945389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency, nature, and predictors of alexia in a convenience sample of individuals with chronic aphasia

Abstract: Background: It is broadly known that persons with chronic aphasia experience difficulty reading. However, the frequency of acquired reading disorders (alexia), and the most common subtype of alexia, as well as predictors of reading in this population are yet to be determined. Aims: This study aims to provide initial evidence regarding the frequency, nature, and predictors of alexia in a large convenience sample of persons with chronic aphasia. Methods & Procedures: Single-word oral reading abilities for lexica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate a superior-to-inferior gradation of reading specialisation across the dorsal and ventral pathways according to lexicality and concreteness. Given the typical perisylvian distribution of middle cerebral artery stroke lesions and its overlap with the phonological network, our results provide a unified explanation not only for the fact that phonological deficits are so prominent in poststroke aphasia (Schwartz et al 2012;Butler et al 2014), but also why nonword reading is so strongly undermined (Fiez et al 2006;Rapcsak et al 2009;Brookshire et al 2014). Indeed, our study aligns with previous work concerning lesion sites associated with phonological dyslexia, which have implicated a variety of perisylvian regions, particularly the insula and LIFG, not only in post-stroke aphasia (Fiez et al 2006;Rapcsak et al 2009;Ripamonti et al 2014) but also in primary progressive aphasia (Henry et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our results demonstrate a superior-to-inferior gradation of reading specialisation across the dorsal and ventral pathways according to lexicality and concreteness. Given the typical perisylvian distribution of middle cerebral artery stroke lesions and its overlap with the phonological network, our results provide a unified explanation not only for the fact that phonological deficits are so prominent in poststroke aphasia (Schwartz et al 2012;Butler et al 2014), but also why nonword reading is so strongly undermined (Fiez et al 2006;Rapcsak et al 2009;Brookshire et al 2014). Indeed, our study aligns with previous work concerning lesion sites associated with phonological dyslexia, which have implicated a variety of perisylvian regions, particularly the insula and LIFG, not only in post-stroke aphasia (Fiez et al 2006;Rapcsak et al 2009;Ripamonti et al 2014) but also in primary progressive aphasia (Henry et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The work of Schwartz (1984) highlighted the notion that functional dissociations can cut across aphasia categories, while Marshall and Newcombe (1973) noted that presence of the three major types of acquired dyslexic errors, visual, semantic, and grapho-phonological, was often dissociated from aphasia symptoms. Most recently, Brookshire et al (2014) presented a literature review showing that reading deficits are often found in all aphasia sub-types and that there is not a one-to-one association between aphasia and reading deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectionist model offers a detailed account of this deficit centered on regions implicated in O–P mapping ( Harm and Seidenberg, 1999 ). A recent review of data from 99 patients with stroke-induced aphasia and reading deficits highlighted the fact that the classical aphasia syndromes do not help to assess reading deficits as these can be co-morbid with all of the aphasia syndromes ( Brookshire et al, 2014 ). By contrast, the approach used in the current study is to directly focus on critical neural systems underlying the cognitive components of reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much has been done to understand the brain bases of aphasia, little is known about reading recovery after stroke, despite the fact that reading impairments affect up to 60% of aphasia patients (Brookshire, Wilson, Nadeau, Gonzalez Rothi, & Kendall, 2014). For example, it is not yet known if recovery of reading ability is supported primarily by perfusion and neural activation in the peri-infarct areas, or by functional reorganization/neural plasticity within the left reading circuit (or both).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%