2014
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency in Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition Research: An Undefined Concept and Some Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the frequency of exposure to the new words was controlled to one occurrence. Since we know from previous research that one exposure is generally regarded as “insufficient” for incidental word learning in most cases [7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 69, 70]), but participants in the current study might have discussed the target words thereby increasing exposure. This lends credibility to the argument that metacognitive prompts training could be effective in enhancing incidental vocabulary learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the frequency of exposure to the new words was controlled to one occurrence. Since we know from previous research that one exposure is generally regarded as “insufficient” for incidental word learning in most cases [7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 69, 70]), but participants in the current study might have discussed the target words thereby increasing exposure. This lends credibility to the argument that metacognitive prompts training could be effective in enhancing incidental vocabulary learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the alternative—direct teaching of vocabulary—may be problematic because many teachers may not know where to begin to help learners independently engage in word learning [11]. Moreover, most incidental vocabulary learning studies that show such negligible gains in vocabulary knowledge are those that do not provide learners any instruction other than telling learners to read [12]. While pioneering studies were aimed confirming a hypothesis that incidental learning through reading was possible for L2 learners the same as first language speakers [13, 14]), in recent years the field has begun asking more nuanced pedagogically-oriented critical questions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applied linguistics studies operationalised word frequency (also) as the frequency of occurrence of a word in a learner's classroom input or instruction materials (e.g., Demetriou 2017;Vidal 2003) and in the input they receive from other sources (e.g., reading outside the classroom, watching videos) (e.g., Horst et al 1998;Peters and Webb 2018) because a frequent word in a native speaker corpus is not necessarily encountered frequently by a foreign language learner. Although both studies using a corpus-based and those using an L2-input based definition of word frequency vary in whether word frequency is that of a word form (whereby the frequencies of distinct word forms, such as learn and learns, will be counted separately), lemma (whereby the frequencies of the root form and of all its inflected forms will be added up), or word family (whereby the frequencies of the root form, all its inflected forms and any derived forms will be added up), most studies indicate that the more frequent a word is, the more likely it is to be learned (Reynolds and Wible 2014). Studies which do not suggest a positive relationship between lexical frequency and lexical learning (e.g., Macis and Schmitt 2017; Pellicer-Sánchez 2017; Szudarski and Carter 2016) indicate that vocabulary learning is the result of the interplay of various factors, some of which may override or moderate the role of lexical frequency.…”
Section: The Role Of Word Frequency In English Vocabulary Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in word difficulty between the target and nontarget words was investigated by measuring word frequency and word length (Willis & Ohashi, 2012). Word frequency was operationalized as the lemma frequency in the British National Corpus (Ellis, 2002(Ellis, , 2012Reynolds & Wible, 2014). Using an independent samples' t test, it was confirmed that there was no significant difference in word frequency between the target and nontarget words, t(158) ¼ .901, p ¼ .369.…”
Section: Vocabulary Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This organizational format could help them look up the words more quickly. In addition, the organizational format could be dependent on the frequency of recurrences of the same word presented in the e-learning context (Reynolds & Wible, 2014). Instruction in this format first showed the students how to find the lemma and word family of a target word in dictionaries.…”
Section: Organizational Formats For Making a Vocabulary Notebookmentioning
confidence: 99%