2016
DOI: 10.1080/21695717.2016.1215874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency importance function for monosyllables in Malayalam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also known that acoustic and linguistic characteristics of a language have a bearing on LTASS and DR. Thus, the SII [5,6] as well as optimal gain and compression required for hearing aids can be language dependent [7][8][9]. Unfortunately, not many studies have been conducted to estimate LTASS and DR for Indian languages, which are spoken by over1.3 billion people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that acoustic and linguistic characteristics of a language have a bearing on LTASS and DR. Thus, the SII [5,6] as well as optimal gain and compression required for hearing aids can be language dependent [7][8][9]. Unfortunately, not many studies have been conducted to estimate LTASS and DR for Indian languages, which are spoken by over1.3 billion people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phonemes are more nasalized and therefore contain more low-frequency energy [ 21 ]. Narne, et al [ 22 ] found that Malayalam has more perceptual weightage for low frequencies compared to English and have attributed the findings to the inherent phonetic differences and use of more nasalized speech. The greater allophonic variations and predominant low-frequency energy suggest that the vowel context effect would be different in Malayalam compared to other languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have suggested the necessity of developing language-specific SII models to better account for the differences in acoustic properties and phoneme distribution across languages (e.g., Wong et al, 2007a;Jin et al, 2017). Consequently, language-specific SII models have been developed for several languages (Wong et al, 2007a;Lee and Kim, 2012;Kuo, 2013;Chen et al, 2016;Jin et al, 2016;Narne et al, 2016). Moreover, the effect of test material on the BIF and transfer function of the SII model has been extended to other languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%