2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0526-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Domain Response at Pacific Coast Harbors to Major Tsunamis of 2005–2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this manner, we'll attempt forecasting the Crescent City harbor in northern California, known for its extreme sensitivity to tsunamis (Wilson et al, 2013;Xing et al, 2013). Figure 18, top panel shows scaled PRFs of the NOAA/NOS tide gage in the harbor to DART 32412 for the origin area of the 2010/10/27 tsunami, computed for a = 0.1 m (a proxy for the linear-limit PRF) and a = 0.5 m. As anticipated, |p 0.1 | ≥ |p 0.5 |, though appreciable difference is observed only 3+ hours after the tsunami arrival.…”
Section: Case Study: Forecasting Crescent City Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner, we'll attempt forecasting the Crescent City harbor in northern California, known for its extreme sensitivity to tsunamis (Wilson et al, 2013;Xing et al, 2013). Figure 18, top panel shows scaled PRFs of the NOAA/NOS tide gage in the harbor to DART 32412 for the origin area of the 2010/10/27 tsunami, computed for a = 0.1 m (a proxy for the linear-limit PRF) and a = 0.5 m. As anticipated, |p 0.1 | ≥ |p 0.5 |, though appreciable difference is observed only 3+ hours after the tsunami arrival.…”
Section: Case Study: Forecasting Crescent City Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In California, the 2010 event generated a maximum tsunami amplitude of 1.2 m at Pismo Beach and caused more than $3 million damage to boats and docks in nearly a dozen harbours. The response in Californian harbours was also examined by XING et al (2013). REYMOND et al (2013) describe the effects of the 2010 tsunami in French Polynesia, as well as the timeline of the warning procedures, the information flow in the warning centre and to the local authorities.…”
Section: Chile Tsunamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors indicated that because tsunami-induced currents were responsible for most of the damage in these two events, modelled current velocity estimates should be incorporated into future forecast products from the warning centres. XING et al (2013) examined the response of three California harbours (Crescent City harbour, Los Angeles/Long Beach Port, and San Diego harbour) to six significant tsunamis (both near-field and far-field) generated between 2005 and 2011. They used a hybrid finite element numerical model in the frequency domain that incorporated effects of wave refraction, diffraction, partial reflection and energy dissipation.…”
Section: The 2011 Tsunami and Its Effects In Other Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%