Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47057-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-Domain Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
275
0
11

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
275
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown by fluorescence measurements (Fig. 3), following the re-organization of the secondary structure, Trp residues are more solvent-exposed in native apo-OASS (maximum at 343 nm) than in holo-OASS (maximum at 338 nm) (43). In holo-OASS, phosphorescence studies (18) indicate that Trp-161 is embedded in a more polar environment than Trp-50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As shown by fluorescence measurements (Fig. 3), following the re-organization of the secondary structure, Trp residues are more solvent-exposed in native apo-OASS (maximum at 343 nm) than in holo-OASS (maximum at 338 nm) (43). In holo-OASS, phosphorescence studies (18) indicate that Trp-161 is embedded in a more polar environment than Trp-50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, Trp fluorescence is complex because of different rotamers in the ground state and the two nearly degenerate electronic states ( 1 L a , 1 L b ) with perpendicular transition moments. Accordingly, numerous studies (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) have focused on the lifetime, quantum yield, Stokes shift, and fluorescence anisotropy. Most of these studies were made with picosecond or nanosecond time resolution (3,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity decays were recovered from the FD data in terms of a multiexponential model using nonlinear least squares analysis Lakowicz et al, 1984;Lakowicz and Gryczinski, 1991;Kang and Lakowicz, 2001;Kang and Kostov, 2002;Kang et al, 2002a,b,c): (2) where the preexponential factor α i is the amplitude of each component, Σα i = 1.0, τ i is the decay time, and n is the number of exponential components. Mean lifetimes were calculated by: (3) where f i is the fractional steady-state contribution of each component to the total emission, and Σf i is normalized to unity.…”
Section: Fd Intensity and Anisotropy Decay Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δφ and δm are the experimental uncertainties in the measured phase and modulation values and were set at 0.2° and 0.005, respectively. The FD anisotropy decays were also analyzed in terms of the multiexponential model using nonlinear least squares analysis (Lakowicz and Gryczinski, 1991;Lakowicz et al, 1993;Kang et al, 2002a,b,c): (10) where g i is the amplitude of the anisotropy component with a rotational correlation time θ i , Σg i = 1.0, and r 0 is the anisotropy in the absence of rotational diffusion. The total anisotropy r 0 was a fitted parameter.…”
Section: Fd Intensity and Anisotropy Decay Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%