1992
DOI: 10.1109/50.143079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency domain analysis of an optical FM discriminator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both quantum dot size distribution and the Fabry-Perot cavity lead to a widely multimode emission. [5]. The LEF is given by the phase to amplitude responses ratio at the highest frequencies, in the limits of the device modulation bandwidth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both quantum dot size distribution and the Fabry-Perot cavity lead to a widely multimode emission. [5]. The LEF is given by the phase to amplitude responses ratio at the highest frequencies, in the limits of the device modulation bandwidth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this method, the filtered FN PSD and the RIN PSD can be obtained separately, without cross-contamination, and still without reliance on maintaining a specific fringe phase. Even though the RIN can be simply measured through direct detection, it can be convenient to access both quantities in a single measurement [16]. Moreover, the amplitudephase cross-PSD, a quantity that carries useful information [31], is accessible and a separate calibration measurement of I 0 is no longer required to scale the FN PSD.…”
Section: Problems With the Basic Configuration And Standard Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical instrument can take the form of a fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer [16] [figure 1(a)] or Michelson interferometer [17], although multiple-beam interferometer configurations have also been demonstrated [18,19]. The underlying principle remains the same in all cases: when the differential delay is such that the interferometer output is held at the side of an interference fringe, halfway between the maximum and minimum output values, the instrument effectively converts phase or frequency fluctuations into intensity fluctuations that can be readily measured with standard photodetectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[120] measured the modulation response versus frequency of a commerical 1.3 micron DFB laser. The bandwidth was approximately 4.3 GHz, but it was not flat, there was an observeable resonance peak.…”
Section: Dfb Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45] analyzed the frequency-dependent response of a link with a quadrature biased MZI discriminator subject to large modulation-depth AM and FM. [46] studied the intermodulation distortion for a Fabry-Perot discriminated link with a large number of channels, while taking into account both FM and IM on each channel.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%