2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-domain active contours solution to evaluate intima–media thickness of the common carotid artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of dynamic programming and properties of edge-based approach defines arterial layer followed by IMT and LD [31,32]. Active contours and its variation based methods have better performance [22,28]. There are techniques based on statistical modelling [11,14], Haugh transforms [15,22] and Nakagami distribution [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A combination of dynamic programming and properties of edge-based approach defines arterial layer followed by IMT and LD [31,32]. Active contours and its variation based methods have better performance [22,28]. There are techniques based on statistical modelling [11,14], Haugh transforms [15,22] and Nakagami distribution [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active contours and its variation based methods have better performance [22,28]. There are techniques based on statistical modelling [11,14], Haugh transforms [15,22] and Nakagami distribution [33]. Recently, most of the techniques are based on deep learning methods [18,19,29,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Year Thickness error (µm) Current work -2.8 ± 2.1 Bastida-Jumillacite [1] 2015 13.8±31.9 Ilea [7] 2013 80 ± 40 Loizou [14] 2013 30 ± 30 Molinari [20] 2011 43 ± 93 tween efficiency and accuracy for CIMT video analysis. We should note that throughout this paper, all performance evaluations were performed without involving any user interactions.…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%