1994
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(94)90028-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency distributions of hypertext path patterns: A pragmatic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivations in this framework relate to affective states that Kuhlthau (1993) and Nahl (1997) consider as one of the main factors influencing information-seeking activities. Qiu (1994) modeled the path patterns users followed in navigating an early hypertext system (i.e., Hyperties). The author found that Zipf's distribution was the best fit for the frequency of user node visiting.…”
Section: Information Seeking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivations in this framework relate to affective states that Kuhlthau (1993) and Nahl (1997) consider as one of the main factors influencing information-seeking activities. Qiu (1994) modeled the path patterns users followed in navigating an early hypertext system (i.e., Hyperties). The author found that Zipf's distribution was the best fit for the frequency of user node visiting.…”
Section: Information Seeking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have employed "static" measures related to numbers of nodes or links accessed, measures of time and path length [29,26,191 or analyzed selected episodes of movement, tabulating navigation within or across sections of a network [29]. Some investigators have applied statistical techniques to identify "clusters" of nodes and interpret user navigation in terms of these constructs [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A task is an essential factor in the information seeking process. Research has shown that the type of task a user is given influences the user's information seeking, information use, and success (Bilal, 2000, 2001; Borgman et al, 1995; Bystrom & Jarvelin, 1995; Dimitrof & Wolfram, 1995; Hirsh, 1997; Marchionini, 1989, 1995; Qui, 1994; Schacter, Chung, & Dorr, 1998; Solomon, 1993, 1994; Vakkari, 1999). As Figure 1 shows, tasks vary by type (i.e., open‐ended vs. closed), nature (complex vs. simple), and the way they are administered (i.e., fully assigned, semiassigned, fully self‐generated).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%