2006
DOI: 10.1038/nature04646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations

Abstract: The maintenance of genetic variation in traits under natural selection is a long-standing paradox in evolutionary biology [1][2][3] . Of the processes capable of maintaining variation, negative frequency-dependent selection (where rare types are favoured by selection) is the most powerful, at least in theory 1 ; however, few experimental studies have confirmed that this process operates in nature. One of the most extreme, unexplained genetic polymorphisms is seen in the colour patterns of male guppies (Poecili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
229
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
229
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable, however, that unlike the later switch from bright to dull, there is a wide range of body weights at which both pied and bright morphs occur at an approximately equal frequency. Such a pattern of seemingly random, stabile coexistence may be consistent with the scenario of frequency dependent selection maintaining stabile polyphenism, either on a genetic basis (Olendorf et al, 2006), or as a result of a coin-flipping plasticity (Cooper & Kaplan, 1982;Meyers & Bull, 2002). An advantage of being different from the majority, indeed, is expected in this system, as larval densities are often high in O. antiqua (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is notable, however, that unlike the later switch from bright to dull, there is a wide range of body weights at which both pied and bright morphs occur at an approximately equal frequency. Such a pattern of seemingly random, stabile coexistence may be consistent with the scenario of frequency dependent selection maintaining stabile polyphenism, either on a genetic basis (Olendorf et al, 2006), or as a result of a coin-flipping plasticity (Cooper & Kaplan, 1982;Meyers & Bull, 2002). An advantage of being different from the majority, indeed, is expected in this system, as larval densities are often high in O. antiqua (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Levels of male harassment are high in this species (Magurran & Seghers 1994) and previous work has shown that in wild guppy populations inhabiting rivers with a high risk of predation by piscivorous fishes, the sexes segregate in the habitat such that areas of the river with the highest predation risk (deep water) have female-biased sex ratios and areas with the lowest predation risk (shallow water) are male biased (Croft et al 2006). Guppies are highly sexually dimorphic with males being small and brightly coloured and females being large and cryptically coloured, making males more conspicuous to aquatic predators (Olendorf et al 2006). Deep water in rivers with large piscivorous fishes is thus less optimal habitat for male than for female guppies due to this sexual dimorphism; however, females would still be at lower risk from aquatic predators in shallower water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the absence of any performance advantages, one might expect the type of variation represented by discrete morphs to simply erode from the population through genetic drift and other random events [7,8]. However, morph coexistence can be favoured if a rarer morph has an advantage that is tempered at higher frequencies [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%