2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-dependent body wave attenuation characteristics in the Kumaun Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) to the estimates obtained in other tectonic areas. The pattern is almost similar to that of Kummaun, India (Singh et al 2012). However, the higher estimates of −1 is mainly attributed to higher degree of heterogeneities in the crust beneath the study area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…5) to the estimates obtained in other tectonic areas. The pattern is almost similar to that of Kummaun, India (Singh et al 2012). However, the higher estimates of −1 is mainly attributed to higher degree of heterogeneities in the crust beneath the study area.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Adams and Abercrombie (1998) estimated the attenuation around the Cajon Pass, southern California, and found that Q from surface data exhibits strong frequency dependence below 10 Hz, but only weak frequency dependence at higher frequency. This observation was also validated by Singh et al (2012) in the Kumaun Himalaya. Abercrombie (1997) suggested that if the frequency independent Q is the case, then the spectral ratios between two different recording depths will have a linear slope on a log-linear plot.…”
Section: Spectral Ratio Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Laboratory studies of melt‐free olivine‐dominated rocks show that Q increases as f 0.2–0.3 [e.g., Faul and Jackson , ], but comparable studies have not been done on crustal rocks. Many studies of seismic wave propagation in continental crust show stronger frequency dependence in tectonically active areas ( Q ~ f 0.4–0.7 ) [ Mitchell , ], and significant bulk modulus attenuation (indicated by Q P / Q S < 1) [e.g., Singh et al ., ; Hazarika et al ., ] unlike the laboratory studies, making it difficult to directly apply laboratory studies of high‐temperature mantle rocks to our crustal study, even with corrections for homologous temperature. Moreover, some of these crustal observations of frequency dependence have been called into question as a potential effect of incorrect geometric spreading corrections [ Morozov , ], so for simplicity we neglect this potential frequency dependence, and report only frequency‐independent t * and Q .…”
Section: Attenuation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%