2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08924.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and time profiles of metric wave isolated Type I solar noise storm bursts at high spectral and temporal resolution

Abstract: Type I noise storms constitute a sizeable fraction of the active Solar radio emission component. Observations of isolated instances of such bursts, in the swept‐frequency mode at metric wavelengths, have remained sparse, with several unfilled regions in the frequency coverage. Dynamic spectra of the burst radiation in the 30–130 MHz band, obtained from the recently commissioned digital High Resolution Spectrograph at the Gauribidanur Radio Observatory, have unravelled in explicit detail the temporal and spectr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar absolute flux density calibration usually relies on the use of the few very bright sources whose flux density is large enough for them to be observed using the same attenuation setting as solar observations. This approach is followed at the Nançay Radio Heliograph (NRH; e.g., Bonmartin et al 1983;Avignon et al 1989), the Gauribidanur Radio Heliograph (GRH; e.g., Sundaram & Subramanian 2004, 2005, and the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR; e.g., Breitling et al 2015;Kontar et al 2017). Conventionally, calibrator observations are scheduled to be observed adjacent to and/or interspersed with observations of the target source(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar absolute flux density calibration usually relies on the use of the few very bright sources whose flux density is large enough for them to be observed using the same attenuation setting as solar observations. This approach is followed at the Nançay Radio Heliograph (NRH; e.g., Bonmartin et al 1983;Avignon et al 1989), the Gauribidanur Radio Heliograph (GRH; e.g., Sundaram & Subramanian 2004, 2005, and the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR; e.g., Breitling et al 2015;Kontar et al 2017). Conventionally, calibrator observations are scheduled to be observed adjacent to and/or interspersed with observations of the target source(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to study the source dynamics in tandem with its sub-second and sub-MHz scale flux variability (e.g. Wild 1957;Elgaroy & Ugland 1970;Guedel & Benz 1990;Sundaram & Subramanian 2005), high fidelity snapshot spectroscopic imag-ing at similar scales is essential. This remained a challenge until the advent of modern interferometric arrays like Murchison Widefield Array (MWA; Tingay et al 2013), LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR; van Haarlem et al 2013) and the Long Wavelength Array (LWA; Ellingson et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonmartin et al 1983;Avignon et al 1989), the Gauribidanur Radio Heliograph (GRH; e.g. Sundaram & Subramanian 2004, 2005 and the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR; e.g. Breitling et al 2015;Kontar et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%