2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and Severity of Thrombocytopenia in Neonatal Sepsis

Abstract: BackgroundNeonatal sepsis includes numerous systemic illnesses such as septicemia, meningitis, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia. In developing countries, the major reason for neonatal mortality is septicemia, which accounts for almost 50% of overall deaths. Thrombocytopenia is one of the most common hematological problems during the neonatal period, affecting the majority of sufferers admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The aim of our study was to find the frequency of thrombocytopenia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their findings showed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of 6.76 was determined as the predictive cut-off value for EOS, with a In the current study, we observed a correlation between thrombocytopenia and culture-positive sepsis. Previous studies on predictive laboratory indices for sepsis have also demonstrated a relationship between thrombocytopenia and neonatal sepsis (16,17). Our study showed no significant relationship between the type of microorganism (Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungus) and the number of platelets (P = 0.109).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Their findings showed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of 6.76 was determined as the predictive cut-off value for EOS, with a In the current study, we observed a correlation between thrombocytopenia and culture-positive sepsis. Previous studies on predictive laboratory indices for sepsis have also demonstrated a relationship between thrombocytopenia and neonatal sepsis (16,17). Our study showed no significant relationship between the type of microorganism (Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungus) and the number of platelets (P = 0.109).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In comparison with non‐sepsis patients, sepsis patients had a more severe microcirculation disorder and dynamic decrease in PLT, and their SOFA score significantly increased after admission. This finding implies that when acute infection develops, a sustained inflammatory reaction can result in an increase PLT consumption and a decrease in PLT count 31–33 . Regardless of whether sepsis is ultimately diagnosed, a decrease in PLT count can be detected, but the decrease in PLT is more obvious in the sepsis group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This finding implies that when acute infection develops, a sustained inflammatory reaction can result in an increase PLT consumption and a decrease in PLT count. [31][32][33] Regardless of whether sepsis is ultimately diagnosed, a decrease in PLT count can be detected, but the decrease in PLT is more obvious in the sepsis group. This is because sepsis has more serious vascular endothelial injury caused by excessive inflammatory reaction, especially the abnormal state of coagulation function characterized by microcirculation disturbance by microthrombosis, which leads to more obvious platelet consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Approximately 75% of neonatal sepsis cases present with reduced PLT levels, which increase mortality almost fourfold. 17 , 20 , 21 Moreover, the MPV/PLT ratio in adult patients with infection is higher than that in neonates, and it is a predictor of the clinical severity and mortality of sepsis; 21 however, this is rarely mentioned in current domestic reports of neonatal infection. This study shows that the proportion of patients with a decreased PLT level in the severe neonatal infection group in the early stage of infection was higher (36.3%) than the proportion in the mild neonatal infection group (2.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%