2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and risk factors for rebleeding events in patients with small bowel angioectasia

Abstract: BackgroundSmall bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia.MethodsA total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the overall rebleeding rate was 22.7%, regardless of ET, which was lower than that reported in the systematic review. According to a recent Japanese study, although there was no statistically significant difference, the rebleeding rates in patients who had and had not undergone ET were 22.7% and 39.1%, respectively. This is comparable with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, the overall rebleeding rate was 22.7%, regardless of ET, which was lower than that reported in the systematic review. According to a recent Japanese study, although there was no statistically significant difference, the rebleeding rates in patients who had and had not undergone ET were 22.7% and 39.1%, respectively. This is comparable with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Having multiple lesions was the only independent predictor in their study of rebleeding. 14 Byeon et al 15 looked at the utility of repeat DBE in the same direction in patients with recurrent obscure GI bleeding. The vast majority of these patients had bleeding from angioectasia and most had oral approach DBE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of AD pts analyzedNo. of pts with rebleedsType/detection of ADFollow-up: % and yearsOutcomeOutcomesSignificant risk factors multivariate analysisEffect OR/HR (95%-CI)Mai et al USA, 2017 [43]RC8714SBA, capsule endoscopy100% at least 1 yearRebleedsNon-isolated GIAD4.2 (1.1–16.2)Chronic kidney disease4.5 (1.0–19.6)Congestive heart failure4.5 (1.0–19.9)90-day mortalityInpatients17.7 (1.7–185.1)Kaufman et al USA, 2016 [44]RC15646SBA, capsule endoscopyRebleedsAge of diagnosis1.05 (1.01–1.09)Active bleeding on capsule endoscopy2.69 (1.15–6.30)Location: quartile 34.29 (1.46–12.56)Jeon et al Korea, 2016 [45]RC6615Balloon assisted enteroscopy90%, mean 1.8RebleedsLiver cirrhosis4.01 (1.1–15.0)Holleran et al Ireland, 2016 [46]RC5645SBA, capsule endoscopy65%, mean 2.7RebleedsMultiple lesionsValvular heart diseaseSakai et al Japan, 2014 [47]RC6823Capsule endoscopy92%, median 2.5Rebleeds…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%