Frequency and outcome of radiological assessments for nasogastric tube placement

Validating nasogastric tube placement with pH testing: A randomized controlled trial protocol

“…Indeed, as expressed by several authors [ 32 ], the use of standard NGTs with a small calibre (8–12 CH) and without a second lumen dedicated to aspiration [ 32 ] sometimes involves difficulties in aspirating gastric secretions, increasing the risk of error; in the face of these problems, the use of chest radiography is indicated to confirm correct placement [ 33 , 34 ]. However, chest radiography involves exposure to radiation [ [33] , [34] , [35] ], an additional cost, and a delay in the start of feeding or any pharmacological therapy [ 36 ]. These delays contrast with the primary objective of feeding through the NGT, which is to improve the nutritional intake of patients at high risk of malnutrition quickly [ 37 ].…”