2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-010-0107-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and Methods of Gastrojejunal Tube Replacement in Children

Abstract: Gastrojejunal (GJ) tubes are increasingly used for enteral feeding in children in whom gastric feeding either is not tolerated or is contraindicated. The most common complications associated with GJ tube use are mechanical failure (clogging, cracking, deterioration) and dislodgement. Less common, but more significant, complications are bowel perforation, aspiration, and feeding intolerance. Some of these complications may be prevented by replacing GJ tubes at regular intervals. Methods to direct a GJ tube incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequent clogging of the jejunal portion of the tube is the most common problem encountered during JF [56, [80][81][82]. Regular replacement of the nasoenteric tubes may prevent clogging; however, the optimal interval is not known.…”
Section: Device-related Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Frequent clogging of the jejunal portion of the tube is the most common problem encountered during JF [56, [80][81][82]. Regular replacement of the nasoenteric tubes may prevent clogging; however, the optimal interval is not known.…”
Section: Device-related Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular replacement of the nasoenteric tubes may prevent clogging; however, the optimal interval is not known. Some authors routinely change tubes at about 3-4 months intervals [82]. Tube Table 1.…”
Section: Device-related Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent decades, gastrojejunostomy tubes (GJTs) have become an alternative for patients who require enteric feeding but have gastric feeding intolerance. Patients with conditions such as gastroparesis, microgastria, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and those in which fundoplication either is unsuccessful or is not an option are candidates for GJT insertion 1 , 2 . GJTs are a favorable alternative in these patients as surgery may be contraindicated, either because of unique anatomy (eg, microgastria in patients with esophageal atresia) or because of other comorbidities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, delayed perforations in the period following the insertion of GJTs are rarely described in the literature 3 , 4 . The risk of bowel perforation caused by GJT insertion is reported to be 1%–2% 1 , 2 . The risk of bowel perforation may be higher in young infants who have a relatively narrow bowel caliber and a thin bowel wall 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%