2011
DOI: 10.1644/10-mamm-a-416.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and duration of contacts between free-ranging raccoons: uncovering a hidden social system

Abstract: Raccoons (Procyon lotor), like most carnivores, are nocturnal and secretive and consequently difficult to observe. We used proximity-detecting collars to determine effects of sex, age, and season on contact rate and duration; document patterns of seasonal contact rates by dyad type and determine whether patterns were random; identify dyads that exhibited contact rates significantly greater than expected and document the persistence of these positive associations across seasons; and document frequency of den sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proximity collars on raccoons (Prange et al 2011) How do social organization and cooperation stabilize each other in multilevel societies?…”
Section: Physiological Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…proximity collars on raccoons (Prange et al 2011) How do social organization and cooperation stabilize each other in multilevel societies?…”
Section: Physiological Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Prange et al (2011) demonstrated that raccoons (Procyon lotor) fitted with proximity loggers exhibited considerably greater sociality than commonly recognized. Their social interactions were characterized by high fission-fusion dynamics with many short-term interactions and few long-term associations.…”
Section: Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predator-prey interactions [22]; intra-specific relationships [23]; social systems [24]) and wildlife epidemiology (i.e. by evaluating contact rate [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past researchers have quantified contact rates by visual observations (Totton et al 2002), simultaneous telemetry locations (very high frequency [VHF] or global positioning system [GPS]) within a specified distance (e.g., ,10 m, Ramsey et al 2002;Schauber et al 2007), or proximity loggers ([PLs]; Ji et al 2005;Prange et al 2011) but, few studies compare these methods (Walrath et al 2011). Visual observations are challenging for nocturnal and cryptic animals, except at feeding or watering areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%