2011
DOI: 10.1021/ac2024602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRep: A Fluorescent Protein-Based Bioprobe for in Vivo Detection of Protein–DNA Interactions

Abstract: We describe a bacterial reporter system, FRep, for rapid and facile detection of protein-DNA recognition. The bioprobe reporter comprises genes of two fluorescent proteins (FPs) separated by a potential DNA target. If a coexpressed transcription factor binds the DNA target, transcription of the second FP is impeded, resulting in loss of FRET partner. Using ratiometric FRET, we show that evaluation of protein-DNA recognition can be reliably made on bZIP and bHLHZ transcription factors and their DNA targets. FRe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, applications using “traditional” FRET pairs for single cell analyses are excluded from this discussion. Some interesting applications of FRET for cellular analyses include measurements of the interaction of cell membrane or intracellular components; ion, metabolite, or small molecule quantification; nucleic acids, nucleic acid binding proteins, and the mechanisms of their action and degradation; cell forces; pathogen discrimination and host/pathogen interactions; , drug discovery; and protein localization, activity, synthesis, and folding. …”
Section: Fluorescence Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, applications using “traditional” FRET pairs for single cell analyses are excluded from this discussion. Some interesting applications of FRET for cellular analyses include measurements of the interaction of cell membrane or intracellular components; ion, metabolite, or small molecule quantification; nucleic acids, nucleic acid binding proteins, and the mechanisms of their action and degradation; cell forces; pathogen discrimination and host/pathogen interactions; , drug discovery; and protein localization, activity, synthesis, and folding. …”
Section: Fluorescence Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the inherent difficulties of investigations of protein–DNA interactions in vitro, Sharavan et al have presented an in vivo FRET-based bioprobe called FREP . In vivo FRET assays, however, suffer from a relativity high instance of false positives and false negatives, in part because the acceptor–donor distance is critical.…”
Section: Single Cell Fluorescent Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the inherent difficulties of investigations of protein−DNA interactions in vitro, Sharavan et al have presented an in vivo FRET-based bioprobe called FREP. 18 In vivo FRET assays, however, suffer from a relativity high instance of false positives and false negatives, in part because the acceptor−donor distance is critical. The unique solution based on works by Fields and Song 19 and Waldo et al, 20 described in this article, utilizes an E. coli cell containing expression vectors for a transcription factor and the reporter, which can be designed for optimal fluoresce transfer.…”
Section: ■ Single Cell Fluorescent Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the pivotal role played by DNA-associating proteins in various cellular processes, many in vitro, in vivo, in silico , and biophysical techniques have been developed to study DNA–protein interactions. In vitro technique includes southwestern assay, yeast one-hybrid assay (Y1H), phage display and proximity ligation assay (PLA); scanning probe microscope (SPM) is a novel in vivo method on the interaction of protein–DNA; biophysical technique includes many methods, such as fluorescence-based techniques [time-resolved fluorescence depolarization, double labeled native gel electrophoresis and fluorescence-based imaging, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) techniques ( Clegg, 1995 )], capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF) ( Riddick and Brumley, 2008 ), also some fluorescence-based protein or nucleic acids bioprobe like FRep ( Shahravan et al, 2011 ), quantum dots (QDs) ( Michalet et al, 2005 ), SPR, nuclear magnetic resonance, circular dichroism (CD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and microcalorimetry ( Dey et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Conventional Methods For Detecting Protein–dna Interaction Amentioning
confidence: 99%