2021 IEEE/ACM 14th International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing (SBST) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/sbst52555.2021.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frenetic at the SBST 2021 Tool Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we compare our WOGAN algorithm to two other algorithms: random search (to establish a baseline) and the Frenetic algorithm [4], a genetic algorithm whose performance was deemed to be among the best of the SBST 2021 CPS testing competition entries [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we compare our WOGAN algorithm to two other algorithms: random search (to establish a baseline) and the Frenetic algorithm [4], a genetic algorithm whose performance was deemed to be among the best of the SBST 2021 CPS testing competition entries [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating valid tests by randomly choosing sequences of plane points is difficult, so we opted to use the feature representation described in [4]. For us, a test is a vector in R 𝑑 whose components are curvature values in the range [−0.07, 0.07].…”
Section: A Novel Algorithm 21 Feature Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Lev dist(i, j) indicates the weighted Levenshtein distance between the road segments. In order to provide a comparative analysis, we compare the results of the proposed test generators in Deeper with the presented test generators in the tool competition, i.e., Frenetic [25], GABExploit and GABExplore [22], Swat [26], and also the earlier version of Deeper [20]. We run the test generators on the test subject based on the same two experiment configurations as in the competition, which are shown in table I.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to carry out an empirical evaluation, we use the setup provided by the cyber-physical systems (CPS) testing competition 1 We provide a comparative analysis on the performance of the proposed bio-inspired test generators in Deeper and five counterpart tools all integrated into the BeamNG simulator. In this regard, we compare the results of the proposed test generators in Deeper with five other test generator tools, Frenetic [25], GABExploit and GABExplore [22], Swat [26], and also the earlier version of the Deeper (based on NSGA-II) [20]-all participating tools in the CPS competition at SBST 2021. In order to do a fair comparison, we consider the same experimental evaluation procedures as the original CPS tool competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane keeping assist system. For the lane keeping assist system, we compare AmbieGen with the open-source approach that showed the best results in the SBST2021 tool competition [34], i.e., Frenetic tool [13]. In the competition the same test evaluation pipeline was provided to all the participants.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%