1971
DOI: 10.1179/amb.1971.18.2.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

French Stahlism and Chemical Studies of Air, 1750–1770

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He referred to this property as the ‘elasticity’, or ‘spring’, of the air, which he characterized quantitatively in what became known as Boyle's law of ideal gases ( PV =const.). He differentiated ‘perennial air’ from vapours and exhalations, which were rendered ‘elastical for a while’ and by ‘manifest outward agents’; Boyle treated elasticity as an essential and immutable property of the microscopic particles of air [ 3 , pp. 97–99].…”
Section: Pneumatic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He referred to this property as the ‘elasticity’, or ‘spring’, of the air, which he characterized quantitatively in what became known as Boyle's law of ideal gases ( PV =const.). He differentiated ‘perennial air’ from vapours and exhalations, which were rendered ‘elastical for a while’ and by ‘manifest outward agents’; Boyle treated elasticity as an essential and immutable property of the microscopic particles of air [ 3 , pp. 97–99].…”
Section: Pneumatic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He deliberately extended his theory beyond Robert Boyle's ideas that vapours were particles suspended in the air, while not sharing the same nature as air. 6 Although allowing that vapours could form in this way, Brownrigg argued that different kinds of elastic fluid made up the atmosphere, each of which reacted with solids and liquids differently according to their properties. However, because Brownrigg did not publish these papers except half of the fourth one in 1765, they were not known except to a limited group, and his work has remained unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%