2012
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e318244154a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

French Population Exposure to Ionizing Radiation from Diagnostic Medical Procedures in 2007

Abstract: VThe objective of this study was to update the 2002 data on medical exposure of the French population to ionizing radiation. It is based on 2007 data and only includes exposures from diagnostic procedures: conventional radiology, computed tomography, nuclear medicine, and diagnostic interventional radiology. Relevant data concerning the nature and frequencies of the examinations were obtained from two main sources: the national health insurance data for private practice and representative surveys in public hos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…UNSCEAR [1] estimates the CT dose contribution for developed countries (health level I) to 47% during the period of the study (1997–2007), while recent works reported in six European countries and the USA indicate CT dose contributions ranging from 46% up to 80% of the total collective dose for the years 2006 to 2008 [7-13]. In parallel to the widespread of CT, there has been an increasing concern at the international level on the radiological risk associated the use of this radiological modality especially in paediatrics reflected in scientific literature [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UNSCEAR [1] estimates the CT dose contribution for developed countries (health level I) to 47% during the period of the study (1997–2007), while recent works reported in six European countries and the USA indicate CT dose contributions ranging from 46% up to 80% of the total collective dose for the years 2006 to 2008 [7-13]. In parallel to the widespread of CT, there has been an increasing concern at the international level on the radiological risk associated the use of this radiological modality especially in paediatrics reflected in scientific literature [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for temporal variations in the number and types of IR procedures performed, we assumed that CT scans and interventional radiology procedures were not used before 1980, and that the frequency of these procedures increased linearly until 2007. With respect to X‐ray procedures, we assumed that from 1980 to 2007 the number of X‐ray procedures decreased linearly, so that the total frequency of diagnostic external IR procedures (X‐rays, CT scans and interventional radiology combined) was constant …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to X-ray procedures, we assumed that from 1980 to 2007 the number of X-ray procedures decreased linearly, so that the total frequency of diagnostic external IR procedures (X-rays, CT scans and interventional radiology combined) was constant. 6,11,[14][15][16] Estimation of lifetime cumulative organ dose exposures from internal medical ionizing radiation (nuclear medicine). The age-and sex-specific average annual radiation doses delivered to each organ from diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures were estimated by combining age-and sex-specific diagnostic test frequencies and their respective effective doses.…”
Section: Exposure To Medical Ionizing Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations