2014
DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2014.901656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frege on Truth, Assertoric Force and the Essence of Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars claim that if we take these points into account, 15. Greimann (2007;2014) himself admits this point. 16.…”
Section: Frege Is Not An Assertion Theoristmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars claim that if we take these points into account, 15. Greimann (2007;2014) himself admits this point. 16.…”
Section: Frege Is Not An Assertion Theoristmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The A-theory reading (Greimann 2004;2014) starts with pointing out that Frege's primary question regarding truth is what kind of role the notion of truth plays in judging and asserting. The gist of the A-theory reading is that Frege's answer to this question develops into the assertion theory of truth.…”
Section: The A-theory Reading Of Frege's Conception Of Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…… For the same reason as before I put this also in the dependent form “that it is true that sea‐water is salty.” (Frege, 1915, p. 251)Although Frege in MBLI already provides a reason he regards as sufficient to believe that “true” — or any other predicate — does not stand for assertoric force, he rebuts the objection by appealing to the further point that “true” has no substantive sense to contribute to a thought. Greimann (2014, p. 281) does not regard this redundancy point as important; he argues that what matters is just that because we can put “It is true that sea‐water is salty” without asserting it, “true” like any other predicate does not stand for assertoric force. The semantic inertness of “true,” Greimann says, is not the fundamental reason why Frege argues for the assertoric inertness of “true.” I agree with the last point.…”
Section: “My Basic Logical Insights”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreters navigate this puzzling passage by developing different interpretations of what Frege means by “the essence of logic” here (cf. Greimann (2014), Pedriali (2017), Taschek (2008)). For instance, Greimann argues as follows:
Frege does not explain what exactly he means by “essence” when he says that the word “true” indicates the essence of logic.
…”
Section: “My Basic Logical Insights”mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation