2011
DOI: 10.1021/je100994v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freezing Point Depressions of Aqueous MEA, MDEA, and MEA−MDEA Measured with a New Apparatus

Abstract: Freezing points for aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA), methyl diethanolamine (MDEA), and MEA−MDEA solutions were measured in the concentration range from 0 to 0.4 mass fractions of the alkanolamines. For the aqueous MEA−MDEA system, freezing points for 1:4, 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1 molar ratios of MEA/MDEA were determined. The experimental values indicate that the MDEA−water interaction is stronger than the MEA−water interaction. Measurements were carried out by a new modified Beckmann apparatus, which has not prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no indications of hydrate formation at t > À35°C. There is a complete lack of SLE data for comparison, and there is a need 16 whereby both chemicals induce FPD in the aqueous system. The recommendations for avoiding precipitation in the ternary system are equivalent to those for the aqueous PZ system as discussed above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were no indications of hydrate formation at t > À35°C. There is a complete lack of SLE data for comparison, and there is a need 16 whereby both chemicals induce FPD in the aqueous system. The recommendations for avoiding precipitation in the ternary system are equivalent to those for the aqueous PZ system as discussed above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus itself was not changed, but the method for determining the phase change was altered. The phase change cannot be recognized the same way Fosbøl et al 16 described it for ice. The heat developed during phase transition is simply not sufficient to show the same distinct temperature phenomena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to an increased viscosity and intrusion of air bubbles, which makes it difficult to have a uniformly stirring and identification of the solid formation. [15] a Standard uncertainties (u) for the temperature, weight fractions, and the pressure are u(°C) = 0.2 °C, u(w) = 0.0001, u(p) = 1 kPa. The temperatures are also reported as the standard deviation of the mean in the table.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus used to measure the freezing points of the solutions is described by Fosbøl et al 15 .…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%