2015
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freezing behaviour facilitates bioelectric crypsis in cuttlefish faced with predation risk

Abstract: Cephalopods, and in particular the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis, are common models for studies of camouflage and predator avoidance behaviour. Preventing detection by predators is especially important to this group of animals, most of which are soft-bodied, lack physical defences, and are subject to both visually and non-visually mediated detection. Here, we report a novel cryptic mechanism in S. officinalis in which bioelectric cues are reduced via a behavioural freeze response to a predator stimulus. The red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that bioelectric crypsis works for the prey of elasmobranchs as well. The common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis will cease moving, ventilating and occlude their gill cavities when they are exposed to looming visual stimuli of teleosts and elasmobranchs but not decapod predators (Bedore et al, ). When C. limbatus and S. tiburo were presented with a reduced bioelectric field that simulated the cuttlefish freeze behaviour (Figure ), the sharks bit at the electrodes 50% fewer times than when cuttlefish resting stimuli were presented.…”
Section: Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to note that bioelectric crypsis works for the prey of elasmobranchs as well. The common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis will cease moving, ventilating and occlude their gill cavities when they are exposed to looming visual stimuli of teleosts and elasmobranchs but not decapod predators (Bedore et al, ). When C. limbatus and S. tiburo were presented with a reduced bioelectric field that simulated the cuttlefish freeze behaviour (Figure ), the sharks bit at the electrodes 50% fewer times than when cuttlefish resting stimuli were presented.…”
Section: Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary y-axis + body movement, secondary yaxis = bioelectric voltage. Reproduced with permission from Bedore et al, (2015) FISH…”
Section: Predator Detection and Bioelectric Crypsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defensive functions, usually related to visual stimuli, have been investigated extensively in cephalopods, especially camouflage ( Langridge et al, 2007 ; Allen et al, 2010 ; Staudinger et al, 2013 ; Bedore et al, 2015 ; Panetta et al, 2017 ), escape jetting ( Otis and Gilly, 1990 ; Preuss and Gilly, 2000 ; Huffard, 2006 ), and chemical defense ( Derby et al, 2007 , 2013 ). In contrast, little attention has been paid to cephalopod responses to noxious stimulation or injury of the body, although the squid giant axon has been used to study cellular reactions to injury ( Fishman et al, 1990 ; Godell et al, 1997 ).…”
Section: Immediate Responses To Noxious Stimulation In Cephalopod Molmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatchlings also possess a number of secondary defensive tactics that do not involve body patterning. For instance, recent evidence suggests that cuttlefish may be able to counter the electrical detection by sharks and other non‐visual predators with a “freeze” response (Bedore, Kajiura, & Johnsen, ). Whether this occurs in hatchlings and juveniles has yet to be determined.…”
Section: Hatchlings and Early Juvenilesmentioning
confidence: 99%