2020
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freeze‐dried immobilized kefir culture in cider‐making

Abstract: BACKGROUNDThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the fermentation efficiency of freeze‐dried immobilized kefir culture on natural supports (apple pieces, delignified cellulosic material) in cider making at various temperatures (5–45 °C) in comparison with freeze‐dried free cells. Freeze‐dried cells were initially tested in apple juice fermentations at 30 °C, and then the freeze‐dried cultures produced with no cryoprotectants were assessed in repeated batch fermentations.RESULTSRepeated batch fermentation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Free or immobilized kefir cells were evaluated regarding their fermentation efficiency in repeated batch fermentations for a period of 3 months. Wine-making at 37 • C using wet or freeze-dried immobilized kefir culture on DCM resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower fermentation times compared to fermentations with free cells, in accordance to our previous studies [15,16]. Ethanol concentration ranged 6.7-10.5% (v/v) and higher mean values were noted in fermentations with wet and freeze-dried cells when immobilized kefir culture on DCM was used, although not significantly.…”
Section: Repeated Batch Fermentationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Free or immobilized kefir cells were evaluated regarding their fermentation efficiency in repeated batch fermentations for a period of 3 months. Wine-making at 37 • C using wet or freeze-dried immobilized kefir culture on DCM resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower fermentation times compared to fermentations with free cells, in accordance to our previous studies [15,16]. Ethanol concentration ranged 6.7-10.5% (v/v) and higher mean values were noted in fermentations with wet and freeze-dried cells when immobilized kefir culture on DCM was used, although not significantly.…”
Section: Repeated Batch Fermentationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Higher ethanol productivities [up to 55.3 g/(Ld)] were noted in fermentations with immobilized cells (both wet and freezedried) at 37 • C in comparison to free cells [19], although not significantly in all cases, but in levels similar or greater than usually noticed in industrial fermentations [19,22]. Importantly, as repeated batch fermentations proceeded, fermentation times, ethanol production and fermentation kinetic data were improved for all freeze-dried kefir cells, indicating cell adaptation [19,23,24], despite the high fermentation temperature (37 • C) [16], and a high operational stability that could be adopted by the wine sector for low alcohol wine production [2]. On the contrary, at 45 • C, significantly (p < 0.05) higher residual sugars and significantly (p < 0.05) lower conversion values were documented compared to fermentations carried out at 37 • C (especially after the first batch fermentation) [15], probably due to "yeast stress" induced by the high temperature [19,25].…”
Section: Repeated Batch Fermentationsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are considered as having an impact on the complexity of aroma even at concentrations below their odor detection thresholds [51,52]. Octanoic and decanoic acids that have been identified in the PAB samples have been reported as the most abundant acids in wines and cider [17,[53][54][55]; decanoic acid was identified in lower concentrations and only in certain samples. In all cases, no significant differences were observed (p > 0.05).…”
Section: Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%