2016
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7931.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FreeSASA: An open source C library for solvent accessible surface area calculations

Abstract: Calculating solvent accessible surface areas (SASA) is a run-of-the-mill calculation in structural biology. Although there are many programs available for this calculation, there are no free-standing, open-source tools designed for easy tool-chain integration. FreeSASA is an open source C library for SASA calculations that provides both command-line and Python interfaces in addition to its C API. The library implements both Lee and Richards’ and Shrake and Rupley’s approximations, and is highly configurable to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
274
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
274
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PyMol's align function was used to perform a sequence‐guided structural alignment, and the fit of the superimposed structures was evaluated by root mean squared deviation. Solvent‐accessible surface area for http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=1MDT was calculated using FreeSASA .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PyMol's align function was used to perform a sequence‐guided structural alignment, and the fit of the superimposed structures was evaluated by root mean squared deviation. Solvent‐accessible surface area for http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=1MDT was calculated using FreeSASA .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all bases for which there was modification data, true positives were considered bases with >2Å solvent accessible surface area in the crystal structure of the rabbit ribosome from 5FLX, with values transferred to homologous nucleotides for mouse. 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also used another package called 3V for a thorough benchmarking and found that the difference, in this case, was smaller (difference < 1%). In terms of the SA, we found that the output from the Gaussian model differs by ~6–6.5% from the vdWSA computed using the hard‐sphere model by FREESASA . Once again for a thorough benchmark, we also used NACCESS and the difference was found to be ~4.5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%