1993
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7152(93)90015-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freeman—Tukey chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were analyzed using Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests [11]. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analyzed using Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests [11]. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed and ranked the various models based on different combinations of the explanatory variables using multi‐model inferencing and Akaike's information criterion (AIC). To test for the fit of the leading models to the data, the leading models were further assessed by Freeman‐Tukey χ 2 goodness‐of‐fit statistics (Read ); full code can be found in .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered covariates with summed model weights greater than 0.5 to be the most statistically important (Erb et al ). Last, we evaluated quality of the leading models using Freeman–Tukey chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit tests based on 1,000 bootstrapped samples (Read ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%