The Law of the Sea 2006
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299614.003.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freedom of Navigation in a Post 9/11 World: Security and Creeping Jurisdiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Provisions for other states like LLSs to exploit "surplus" resources in coastal states' EEZs under UNCLOS Article 69 are complicated, relying on the economic and geographic circumstances of all states involved under Articles 61 and 62. Generally, the provisions of access were aimed to maintain peace among states but also served as a diplomatic ploy for disadvantaged LLSs, particularly those from the Global South, to feel included in ocean management (Wani, 1982;Kaye, 2006).…”
Section: The Consequences Of Being Landlockedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provisions for other states like LLSs to exploit "surplus" resources in coastal states' EEZs under UNCLOS Article 69 are complicated, relying on the economic and geographic circumstances of all states involved under Articles 61 and 62. Generally, the provisions of access were aimed to maintain peace among states but also served as a diplomatic ploy for disadvantaged LLSs, particularly those from the Global South, to feel included in ocean management (Wani, 1982;Kaye, 2006).…”
Section: The Consequences Of Being Landlockedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nuclear-powered merchant ship navigating inside exclusive economic zones is able to enjoy freedom of navigation, which leaves regulatory power over these ships to the flag states. Although “coastal states have jurisdiction with regard to the protection and preservation of marine environment” in the exclusive economic zones, whether such jurisdiction indicates that coastal states can take regulatory measures against nuclear-powered merchant ships in the exclusive economic zones on the grounds of marine environmental protection remains uncertain and may lead to disputes among states in practice [ 84 ].…”
Section: Shortcomings In the Existing International Regulatory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los documentos oficiales estadounidenses definen la libertad de navegación como el conjunto de "derechos, libertades y usos legales del mar y del espacio aéreo, incluyendo buques y aeronaves militares, reconocidos por el derecho internacional" (U.S. Department of Defense 2015, 2). Esos derechos son usualmente desafiados por los llamados "reclamos excesivos" de los países ribereños (Roach y Smith 2012), asociados con los conceptos de "jurisdicción rampante" y nacionalismo marítimo, que buscarían restringir la operación de Armadas de terceros países en espacios jurisdiccionales (Oxman 2006;Kaye 2006;Dutton 2010;Kraska y Pedrozo 2013). Galdorisi (1998, 76) identifica tres tipos de conflictos generados por "reclamos excesivos" de los ribereños que afectan a la Armada de EEUU: aquellos que limitan la movilidad, los que obstruyen la presencia y los que impiden el alistamiento.…”
Section: La Libertad De Navegación En La Cnudmunclassified
“…Aunque hasta el momento esas prácticas no constituyen costumbre internacional, la tendencia es favorable a los enfoques territorialistas (Kaye 2006). La preocupación de EEUU sobre un posible cambio de paradigma del Derecho del Mar llevó a la temprana creación del Programa de Libertad de Navegación, durante los debates de la actual CNUDM.…”
Section: La Libertad De Navegación En La Cnudmunclassified