2014
DOI: 10.1002/wdev.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freedom of expression: cell‐type‐specific gene profiling

Abstract: Cell fate and behavior are results of differential gene regulation, making techniques to profile gene expression in specific cell types highly desirable. Many methods now enable investigation at the DNA, RNA and protein level. This review introduces the most recent and popular techniques, and discusses key issues influencing the choice between these such as ease, cost and applicability of information gained. Interdisciplinary collaborations will no doubt contribute further advances, including not just in singl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method requires no cell-type specific purification but involves expressing the protein of interest at high levels, which may in turn influence cell fate or result in aberrant fusion-protein binding. Cell-type specific transcriptional profiling can also be performed in this manner 21 , via the targeted expression of a tagged RNA-binding protein 22 , a ribosomal protein 23 , or an RNA modifying enzyme 24 . These methods often require large amounts of starting material and immunoprecipitation.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method requires no cell-type specific purification but involves expressing the protein of interest at high levels, which may in turn influence cell fate or result in aberrant fusion-protein binding. Cell-type specific transcriptional profiling can also be performed in this manner 21 , via the targeted expression of a tagged RNA-binding protein 22 , a ribosomal protein 23 , or an RNA modifying enzyme 24 . These methods often require large amounts of starting material and immunoprecipitation.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digested DNA is column purified to exclude un-cut, genomic DNA from uninduced cells (steps [12][13][14], and adaptors for PCR-amplification are ligated to the DpnI cut fragments (steps [15][16][17][18]. To prevent unmethylated regions of DNA from being aberrantly amplified, the material is digested with DpnII, which only cuts non-methylated GATC sites (steps [19][20][21]). The resulting DNA is then used as template for a PCR reaction to amplify the methylated fragments (steps [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Overview Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, mapping transcription-factor occupancy in vivo in rare cell types, such as stem cells, is technically challenging. DNA adenine methylation identification (DamID) has recently emerged as an alternative approach for genome-wide profiling (Marshall and Brand, 2015;Marshall et al, 2016;Otsuki et al, 2014;Southall et al, 2013;van Steensel and Henikoff, 2000). In DamID, a DNA-or chromatin-binding protein is fused to an E. coli Dam methylase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each human organ consists of many different types of cells working together to carry out complex physiological functions, but understanding cell-type-specific gene expression (Otsuki et al, 2014) is challenging because most published human transcriptome datasets are composite gene-expression profiles generated from mixed cell populations. In this issue of Cell Systems , Butler et al (2016) report a relatively simple but potentially effective way to identify endothelial-cell-enriched genes based on the straightforward correlation of three endothelial-cell-specific reference genes with transcriptome datasets generated from unfractionated human tissues (Butler et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%