2004
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200403001-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free Vascularized Fibular Grafting for the Treatment of Postcollapse Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We sought to better define the typical long-term results after FVFG specifically in patients with precollapse ONFH. In so doing, we sought to answer four specific questions: (1) In what percentage of patients does FVFG preserve the precollapse femoral head beyond 10 years? (2) When longterm preservation of the femoral head is not achieved, what is the duration of femoral head preservation?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We sought to better define the typical long-term results after FVFG specifically in patients with precollapse ONFH. In so doing, we sought to answer four specific questions: (1) In what percentage of patients does FVFG preserve the precollapse femoral head beyond 10 years? (2) When longterm preservation of the femoral head is not achieved, what is the duration of femoral head preservation?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technique previously described in detail [1] was used for all procedures. Several technical modifications have been made during the years and were used in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FVFG procedure has been described in detail elsewhere [1]. All procedures were performed by one of four surgeons, each of whom performed the procedure in a similar fashion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a pedicled fibula transfer was first used to fill an ipsilateral tibial defect (without microvascular anastomosis) in 1905 [9], the concept of performing a FVFG was only realised 70 years later [10]. FVFGs were initially used to treat posttraumatic bony defects; however, the indication rapidly broadened to include bony defects resulting from congenital anomalies, infections and tumors [1,2], as well as salvage scenarios including problematic arthrodeses and the treatment of femoral head AVN [11][12][13]. They are currently the mainstay for extreme reconstructions largely because of their particular anatomical characteristics, reliability and versatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%