2017
DOI: 10.5935/0034-7140.20170011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free trade zone of Manaus: Na impact evaluation using the synthetic control method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…al. 2014, Calderon 2014, De Souza 2014; and local development policies (Kirkpatrick and Bennear 2014, Gobillon and Magnac 2016, Possebom 2017, Ando 2015, among several others.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 2014, Calderon 2014, De Souza 2014; and local development policies (Kirkpatrick and Bennear 2014, Gobillon and Magnac 2016, Possebom 2017, Ando 2015, among several others.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 GDP growth in the municipality of Manaus, and even that observed at the level of the state of Amazonas (5.3%), was higher on average than the growth observed in Brazil (3.6%) in the 2000 to 2010 decade. 7 Possebom (2017) has recently used a synthetic control method to try to evaluate the economic impact of the FTZM over a long time period , though his study relies on macro-aggregates and not individual-level data. The author concludes that the FTZM subsidy policy achieved its goal of promoting regional economic growth, though not all sectors benefited from the presumed positive spillovers from the manufacturing sector (in particular, agriculture).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our inequality decompositions are omitted to save space but available from the authors upon request. 40 As already mentioned in note 7, to our knowledge, the only effort to clearly evaluate the impact of the FTZM is the recent paper by Possebom (2017). In his article the author develops a synthetic control method that does not rely on microdata at the individual level but on macro-aggregates such as GDP per capita and agriculture, manufacture or services total production per capita for "minimum comparable areas" (local economic units stable over time).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esse último resultado é contraintuitivo em face da relevância da indústria no PIM. O impacto no setor de acordo comPossebom (2017), "indicates that the main impact of the FTZM was due to lower import tariffs than those imposed in the rest of the country, attracting Brazilian tourists willing to buy imported goods at lower prices". O resultado global (impacto positivo no PIB per capita), por sua vez, parece intuitivo: é esperado que um município que recebeu incentivos federais e estaduais significativos tenha desempenho superior a outros municípios semelhantes que não tiveram acesso a esses benefícios.…”
unclassified