2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-09120-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-Standing Working Electrodes for Supercapacitors Based on Composite Polymer Nanofibers and Functionalized with Graphene Oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the incorporation of ZnO@ZnS CS NPs content by 5%, 8%, and 10% increased the electrical response to 1.02 V, 2.33 V, and 4.42 V, respectively, as shown in Figure 8c. The conversion sensitivity of the PVDF fabricated device recorded almost 0.091 V/N•mm 3 , while that of the PVDF-10 wt % ZnO@ZnS composite mat recorded a sensitivity of 0.153 V/N•mm 3 which is better that the best energy harvester devices reported in the previous work [72]. A comparison of the presented piezoelectric device performance with previously reported data is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: The Piezoelectric Response Of the Nanogenerator Devicesupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the incorporation of ZnO@ZnS CS NPs content by 5%, 8%, and 10% increased the electrical response to 1.02 V, 2.33 V, and 4.42 V, respectively, as shown in Figure 8c. The conversion sensitivity of the PVDF fabricated device recorded almost 0.091 V/N•mm 3 , while that of the PVDF-10 wt % ZnO@ZnS composite mat recorded a sensitivity of 0.153 V/N•mm 3 which is better that the best energy harvester devices reported in the previous work [72]. A comparison of the presented piezoelectric device performance with previously reported data is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: The Piezoelectric Response Of the Nanogenerator Devicesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since the 1980s, it has been related to materials science and nanotechnology aspects and lately has drawn increasing attention [1]. The important feature of such a technique is its development for lots of applications owing to its easiness and truncated energy consumption [2][3][4][5]. Many modifications in the electrospinning experimental setup have been conducted, especially in the spinneret and the collector, to obtain a better morphology and characteristics of the spun fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite shows a specific capacitance of ∼3.42 F g −1 at 0.05 A g −1 , higher than the ∼1.68 F g −1 of PIND/PAN nanofibers. 19 In an effort to eliminate the current collector, Zhu et al first utilized electrophoretic deposition to coat MXENE on FTO-coated glass, followed by electrochemical polymerization of PPy. The PPy/MXENE film was carefully peeled off from the FTO-coated glass and showed ∼203 mF cm −2 at 30 mV s −1 when applied as a collector-less freestanding electrode.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elmessiry et al directly electrospun polyindole (PIND)/PAN/GO nanofibers on the stainless steel collector, which is then utilized as an additive-less electrode. The composite shows a specific capacitance of ∼3.42 F g –1 at 0.05 A g –1 , higher than the ∼1.68 F g –1 of PIND/PAN nanofibers . In an effort to eliminate the current collector, Zhu et al first utilized electrophoretic deposition to coat MXENE on FTO-coated glass, followed by electrochemical polymerization of PPy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%