Free-Space Laser Communications 2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-28677-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-space laser communication performance in the atmospheric channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
56
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical values for adjacent channel rejection ratio ranges from -20 dB to -30 dB [30][31][32], however in this work, the level of crosstalk (relative to signal at the photodiode) which could be worsened by asymmetric demux input powers is allowed to vary from negligible case of -30 dB to a very worse case of -5 dB and the resulting crosstalk effect is calculated and shown for each case. A target BER of 9 10  is considered for systems without forward error correction coding (FEC) [33,34], and 3 10  is considered for systems with FEC. Also the required optical power is defined as the average power at the input of the optical amplifier required to achieve the target BER.…”
Section: Single Crosstalk Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical values for adjacent channel rejection ratio ranges from -20 dB to -30 dB [30][31][32], however in this work, the level of crosstalk (relative to signal at the photodiode) which could be worsened by asymmetric demux input powers is allowed to vary from negligible case of -30 dB to a very worse case of -5 dB and the resulting crosstalk effect is calculated and shown for each case. A target BER of 9 10  is considered for systems without forward error correction coding (FEC) [33,34], and 3 10  is considered for systems with FEC. Also the required optical power is defined as the average power at the input of the optical amplifier required to achieve the target BER.…”
Section: Single Crosstalk Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GG distribution model is widely accepted for characterising the weak, moderate and strong turbulence conditions because results achieved match closely with experimental results [1,9,21]. The GG probability density function (pdf) is given as [1,2,6]   a mean value of 1, and in the turbulent free limit, this mean value is attained at all times.…”
Section: Channel Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The effects of turbulence are characterized using the gamma-gamma (GG) probability density function (pdf), which is given as [10,13,29] Desired ONU Transmitter (Tx,d)…”
Section: Turbulence Channel Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%