2005
DOI: 10.1109/mdso.2005.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free riding on Gnutella revisited: the bell tolls?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
186
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…After Adar and Huberman's work, there have been other studies observing free riding in P2P networks [9,[37][38][39]. In general, the results indicate an increasing level of free riding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After Adar and Huberman's work, there have been other studies observing free riding in P2P networks [9,[37][38][39]. In general, the results indicate an increasing level of free riding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general, the results indicate an increasing level of free riding. For example, Hughes et al observed that 85% of peers share no files at all [37]. Similarly, Yang et al reported a high level of free riding in the Maze P2P network in spite of the incentive mechanism provided by the system [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose two BitTorrent-like mechanisms for distributing the security patches. In file-sharing networks such as Gnutella, a very small fraction (5%) of hosts usually provide a large fraction of the shared files (70%) [14]. Exploiting this asymmetry in file-sharing, we consider first disseminating the security patches to these popular hosts, such that most of the other participating hosts can receive the patches from these popular hosts when they actively download files from them.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most decentralized systems such as Gnutella and KaZaA, downloading traffic is highly focused around a small minority of popular targets and these popular files tend to be gradually concentrated in a small set of providers. For example, in Gnutella, 50% of all files are served by just 1% of nodes and 98% of all files are shared by the top 20% nodes [14]; in KaZaA, 10% most popular files generate 60% of the download traffic and 70% of the highly popular files will remain popular for at least 10∼15 days [18]. These are strong indications that a small fraction of popular hosts sharing the most interesting files could be conveniently leveraged as the early distributors, which effectively push security patches to active downloaders in the system.…”
Section: Scheme Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments are designed to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed iCluster protocols over (a) a state-of-the-art approach for peer organization and retrieval [5] and (b) exhaustive search by flooding [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%