2007
DOI: 10.1021/es070275f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free Radical Chemistry of Advanced Oxidation Process Removal of Nitrosamines in Water

Abstract: Absolute rate constants and degradation efficiencies for hydroxyl radical reactions with seven low-molecular-weight nitrosamines in water have been evaluated using a combination of electron-pulse radiolysis/absorption spectroscopy and steady-state radiolysis/GCMS measurements. The hydroxyl radical oxidation rate constants were found to depend upon nitrosamine size and to have a very good linear correlation with the number of methylene groups in these compounds. This correlation, given by In(k x OH) = (19.72 +/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2 shows the ratio of the reaction rate constants of NPYR and pCBA with OH using the relative rate methodology. The ratio of k OH,NPYR /k OH,pCBA was 0.276, and thus k OH,NPYR was calculated to be 1.38 (± 0.05) Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 , which was comparable to the literature value of 1.75 (± 0.07) Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 obtained by pulse radiolysis (Landsman et al, 2007). In summary, Table 1 compares the molar absorptivities, quantum yields, rate constants of NPYR and NDMA reacting with OH, ozone and quantum yields by the direct photolysis at 254 nm.…”
Section: Kinetics Modelingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S2 shows the ratio of the reaction rate constants of NPYR and pCBA with OH using the relative rate methodology. The ratio of k OH,NPYR /k OH,pCBA was 0.276, and thus k OH,NPYR was calculated to be 1.38 (± 0.05) Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 , which was comparable to the literature value of 1.75 (± 0.07) Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 obtained by pulse radiolysis (Landsman et al, 2007). In summary, Table 1 compares the molar absorptivities, quantum yields, rate constants of NPYR and NDMA reacting with OH, ozone and quantum yields by the direct photolysis at 254 nm.…”
Section: Kinetics Modelingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, photodecomposition, advanced oxidation (e.g. O 3 /H 2 O 2 , UV/H 2 O 2 , UV/TiO 2 ), reverse osmosis and chemical reduction processes have been considered and verified being capable of removing nitrosamines from water efficiently (Gui et al, 2000;Stefan and Bolton, 2002;Sharpless and Linden, 2003;Mezyk et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2005aLee et al, , 2005bDavie et al, 2006;Landsman et al, 2007;Lee et al, 2007;Plumlee and Reinhard, 2007;Frierdich et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2012;Mestankova et al, 2014). In addition to its wide application as a mean for disinfection, UV irradiation is an effective process to decompose nitrosamines including NDMA and NPYR (Stefan and Bolton, 2002;Lee et al, 2005a;Xu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several alternative disinfectants such as O 3 are able to produce nitrosamines, but usually at lower concentrations than chloramines (Najm and Trussell, 2001;Andrzejewski et al, 2008). In contrast, UV and advanced oxidation processes have both been investigated as possible strategies to decrease or eliminate nitrosamine in water (Stefan and Bolton, 2002;Lee et al, 2005;Landsman et al, 2007). In fact, NDMA levels of P5 decreased to 3.5 ng/L in finished water after LPUV/OCl − treatment.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Formation Of Nitrosaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landsman et al [25] evaluated the absolute rate constants and degradation efficiencies for hydroxyl radical reactions with seven low-molecular-weight nitrosamines by using the combination of electron-pulse radiolysis/absorption spectroscopy and steady-state radiolysis/GC-MS measurement. The removal rate of NDEA by hydroxyl radicals was (86.0±3.3)%, and the reaction rate constants of NDEA with hydroxyl radicals and hydrated electrons were (6.99±0.28)×10 8 (mol·L −1 ) −1 ·s −1 and (1.61±0.12)×10 10 (mol·L −1 ) −1 ·s −1 , respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%