Cyclocondensation between acyclic 5-aminopent-2-enoate esters and aliphatic aldehydes containing an unsubstituted amethylene unit affords 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine derivatives in good yields. The reaction has been applied to a range of aldehydes, showing good functional group tolerance. Chemoselective hydride reduction of the enamine double bond provides 3,4-disubstituted tertiary piperidine derivatives with acceptable to good diastereoselectivities, whereas catalytic hydrogenation of N-benzyl derivatives leads directly to the corresponding secondary piperidines.The 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine substructure 5 (Scheme 1) is interesting because of its presence in alkaloids such as cathenamine (1) and vallesiachotamine (2) and also as a key functionality in synthetic schemes leading to several natural products ( Figure 1). 1
Figure 1We have recently described the synthesis of 2-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes 6 2 and 3-hydroxypiperidine derivatives 7 3 using tetrahydropyridine precursors 5 (where R 1 , R 2 = alkyl). These applications took advantage of the ability of the enamine functionality to generate iminium ions or undergo double bond hydrogenation, respectively. Cyclic enamines 5 were readily accessed by condensation of the appropriate amine 3 and aldehyde 4 precursors through presumed acyclic enamine intermediates. 2-4 The preparation of bicyclic piperidines 7 was studied in some detail and found to be compatible with different substitution patterns at R 2 , as well as with the presence at R 1 of functionality, which proved useful for further transformations. 3,4 Furthermore, in these rigid bicyclic systems good control of the relative stereochemistry over three contiguous stereogenic centers of 7 was easily attained. 3On the other hand, the application of this method to the preparation of monocyclic enamines of type 9 (Scheme 2) has been limited to N-benzyl-substituted examples (where additionally R 3 = H) derived from simple aliphatic unfunctionalized aldehydes 4, 2 whereas studies devoted to evaluate the generality and stereoselectivity of piperidine synthesis using the strategy depicted in Scheme 2 are lacking. 5 In this paper we disclose the details of a study directed at determining the practicality of the preparation of substituted monocyclic piperidines 10 and 11 (Scheme 2) from selected acyclic amines 8 and aldehydes 4 through tetrahydropyridines 9.
Scheme 2Specific target areas of study have included: 1. the scope in the carbonyl component; 2. the determination of the stereoselectivity of the cyclization and reduction steps in these flexible systems (i.e., in the absence of the geometrical constraints imposed by the rigidity of the bicyclic systems 7 3 ); and 3. the possibility of extending this strategy to the preparation of secondary piperidines 11 (R 2 = H)