2016
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2016.2608802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-Positioning Wireless Power Transfer to Multiple Devices Using a Planar Transmitting Coil and Switchable Impedance Matching Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the input impedance of asymmetric WPT system at frequencies of (18). Substitute (18) into the expression of Zin (22), then the imaginary part of Zin Im(Zin) can be obtained in Figure 14 using parameters for the case ω1 < ω2. In Figure 14, Im(Zin) is close to zero at the frequency corresponding to the maximum output power when k is relatively low; however, as the value of k becomes larger, Im(Zin) are not close to zero at all splitting frequencies, which means that the solutions to Im(Zin) = 0 is not suitable to assess the peak output power in the asymmetric case: Furthermore, when k < k s is met the frequency corresponding to the maximum output power becomes gradually close to the resonant frequency of the transmitter f 1 as shown in Figure 12; this is also consistent with the values of f max in Table 2.…”
Section: The Case Where ω1 ≠ ω2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consider the input impedance of asymmetric WPT system at frequencies of (18). Substitute (18) into the expression of Zin (22), then the imaginary part of Zin Im(Zin) can be obtained in Figure 14 using parameters for the case ω1 < ω2. In Figure 14, Im(Zin) is close to zero at the frequency corresponding to the maximum output power when k is relatively low; however, as the value of k becomes larger, Im(Zin) are not close to zero at all splitting frequencies, which means that the solutions to Im(Zin) = 0 is not suitable to assess the peak output power in the asymmetric case: Furthermore, when k < k s is met the frequency corresponding to the maximum output power becomes gradually close to the resonant frequency of the transmitter f 1 as shown in Figure 12; this is also consistent with the values of f max in Table 2.…”
Section: The Case Where ω1 ≠ ω2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simplify the analysis, the operating frequency is fixed to 145 kHz, which is the same as the resonant frequency of the receiver. According to (22), the input impedance of the asymmetric WPT system is inductive. For a fixed-frequency WPT system the frequency splitting phenomenon causes a drastic variation of output power.…”
Section: Prototype Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is important to eliminate frequency detuning by using a certain control strategy. Many methods to deal with this problem are reported in previous works, including frequency tracking [7-9], impedance matching (IM) [10,11] and compensation capacitor tuning [12][13][14]. In [8], a phase-locked-loop (PLL) controller is applied to the primary side.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IM control is a method that adds an adaptive impedance matching network between the inverters and the primary resonant network or the rectifier and secondary resonant network. The scheme of adaptive IM network consists of a capacitor-switch matrix [10,11]. The method tracks the maximal S-parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%