Free Objects in Joins of Strict Inverse and Completely Simple Semigroup Varieties

Auinger, Karl

doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-45.3.491

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By Theorems 3.7, 3.9 and 4.3 the laws (1-6) hold in every strict orthodox •-semigroup. Conversely, let S be a unary semigroup satisfying (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). By Theorem 2.4, 5 is orthodox.…”

Section: Varieties Of Strict Orthodox ^-Semigroupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bifree objects in e-varieties of strict orthodox semigroups and the lattice of strict orthodox *-semigroup varieties

Auinger

1993

Glasgow Math. J.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For regular semigroups, the appropriate analogue of the concept of a variety seems to be that of an e(xistence)-variety, developed by Hall [6,7,8]. A class V of regular semigroups is an e-variety if it is closed under taking direct products, regular subsemigroups and homomorphic images. For orthodox semigroups, this concept has been introduced under the term “bivariety” by Kaďourek and Szendrei [12]. Hall showed that the collection of all e-varieties of regular semigroups forms a complete lattice under inclusion. Further, he proved a Birkhoff-type theorem: each e-variety is determined by a set of identities. For e-varieties of orthodox semigroups a similar result has been proved by Kaďourek and Szendrei. At variance with the case of varieties, prima facie the free objects in general do not exist for e-varieties. For instance, there is no free regular or free orthodox semigroup. This seems to be true for most of the naturally appearing e-varieties (except for cases of e-varieties which coincide with varieties of unary semigroups such as the classes of all inverse and completely regular semigroups, respectively). This is true if the underlying concept of free objects is denned as usual. Kaďourek and Szendrei adopted the definition of a free object according to e-varieties of orthodox semigroups by taking into account generalized inverses in an appropriate way. They called such semigroups bifree objects. These semigroups satisfy the properties one intuitively expects from the “most general members” of a given class of semigroups. In particular, each semigroup in the given class is a homomorphic image of a bifree object, provided the bifree objects exist on sets of any cardinality. Concerning existence, Kaďourek and Szendrei were able to prove that in any class of orthodox semigroups which is closed under taking direct products and regular subsemigroups, all bifree objects exist and are unique up to isomorphism. Further, similar to the case of varieties, there is an order inverting bijection between the fully invariant congruences on the bifree orthodox semigroup on an infinite set and the e-varieties of orthodox semigroups. Recently, Y. T. Yeh [22] has shown that suitable analogues to free objects exist in an e-variety V of regular semigroups if and only if all members of V are either E-solid or locally inverse.

show abstract

Section: Varieties Of Strict Orthodox ^-Semigroupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Let ST 1 denote the variety of all combinatorial strict inverse (unary) semigroups. With respect to this notation, the free objects in the unary semigroup varieties M~l v S8~' have been constructed by the author in [3].…”

Section: Let a Unary Operation * On Y X Y Be Defined By (Xy)* = {Yxmentioning

confidence: 99%