“…A few studies considered the pricing of academic journals (e.g. Bergstrom, 2001 andMcCabe, 2002), while others focused on various aspects of the review process, for example payment to referees (Engers and Gans, 1998;Chang and Lai, 2001), the value-added from the review process (Laband, 1990), and the increase in the number and the extent of revisions requested prior to publication, which also increases the submit-accept time (Ellison, 2002a;2002b). This trend is an acknowledgement that research on the academic review process is not only interesting, but is also very important, because knowing more about the process and understanding it better may suggest how it can be improved, enhancing the productivity of economists and scholars in other disciplines.…”